Map of Holy Shrines of Europe

    For list of all shrines on the map click: View Larger Map

Red flags are shrines of a saint, blue are of Mary, yellow are for Eucharistic miracles, purple are monasteries, and green are for others.  Each tag has a brief description and URL for its web page. If you find one particular shrine especially interesting I suggest that you Google it, as information about a shrine may be found on several web pages.  Please email me at  dick65bain@aol.com if you know of pilgrim sites not found on this map.  My hope is that as you read about the history and dynamics of these shrines you will find your faith and desire for things spiritual growing – and that you may even find yourself being healed.  Also, if you plan to go to Europe soon you should make it a point to refer to this map.   These are very powerful places of prayer and healing that could become the high point of your vacation.     

 

To contact Father Richard Bain write to him at 404 Oak Marsh Way, Rio Vista, CA 94571; email dick65bain@aol.com  or call 707-374-5611. If you leave your name and address he will mail you a small bottle of Holy Water. His health has improved substantially, but he still cannot celebrate mass with the sound system on or with music, and thus is not ready to schedule Masses for healing.  Please continue praying for his full recovery.

To read Father Bain’s book, God I Choose You, click the bottom link on the left.

                                         

                                    Father Bain’s Homilies

           

Prayer is not limited by time or space!

 

9:02 AM, Tuesday, June 29, 2009

 

Dear Father Bain, 

 

My daughter is in severe pain again since last evening - just started on a dime again. I know somehow it is spiritual, and it is playing off the car accident that we were in April 19, 2008. She has been in pain since then, but now my daughter is really in tremendous pain again?? I, the mother, am starting to loose hope.  I am at my last straw. I just don't know what God wants of me. It has been 20 years of a lot of angles and problems, different health problems, chaos, severe poverty- still going on, constantly counting pennies and dimes and nickels to survive.

 

9:50 am, Tuesday, June 30th.

 

I will say mass today for your daughter.  The Holy Water was put in the mail last Friday.  Don't give up hope. There is a reason why the Lord is allowing your family to go thru this suffering.  In time He will turn it will around.  Father Bain

Due to circumstances, I was not able to say Mass on Tuesday as promised. That evening during my Holy Hour it came to me that it would not be until Thursday that I would be saying mass for the daughter, but that was OK as prayer is NOT limited to time or space.  Thus, it did not matter if the Mass were said on Tuesday as promised or on Thursday.  Sounds crazy, does it not?  But, read on!

 

6:34 AM, Thursday July 2nd.

 

 

Dear Father Bain,

        

Thank You!! My daughter immediately improved during your mass that you said for her. All of a sudden her pains greatly stopped and she became peaceful. I also felt the power of The Holy Spirit and felt great peace in the house. Also the holy water came a little later that day! Thank you so very much Fr. Bain! Where would we be without our great and merciful Lord and savior, our heavenly Mother and all of the angels and saint!

 

 

Mass was said for the daughter at 11:30 AM, July 2nd. 

 

Response from a skeptic.

 

 Dear Father Bain

 

The power of the placebo effect and positive thinking I think!

 

 My Response.

 Absolutely, it most certainly could be that.  What got me to take a good look at it was the deep strong feeling I got during prayer that it was OK to say the mass two days later for the poor girl, in such pain, because the effects of the prayer would go back in time.  But now that you mention the placebo I think I will write to the mother and ask if the girl knew I was going to say a mass for her.  Father Bain

 The mother’ response.

 

Dear Fr. Bain,

        She was totally unaware of absolutely everything.

 

December 20, 2008, Saturday of the Third Week of Advent

 

 
In my mid to late twenties I was assistant corporate secretary of a utility company headquarteredi n San Francisco with gas, electric, telephone, and water properties in five western states. When my boss retired I would become the corporate secretary at the age of thirty- one. About six months before this was to happen, the president of the company died suddenly of a brain aneurysm.   The new president did not take long to inform me that he felt only an attorney should be the corporate secretary. Not getting the promised position was a real disappointment, but the company made it easier by raising my salary nearly a third, letting me go to law school at night, and paying the tuition.

A few months later starting law school, I was offered a job in Honolulu with a construction company.  They were building 600 units of military family housing at two military bases on the island of Oahu, and were looking for someone to negotiated contract change orders. The most significant was a change from wood stud to steel stud due to the termites in Hawaii.

It was a hard decision to make, leaving a secure job, law school, and my friends for a job for which I did not have the background or education – my degree was in psychology.  Three things helped me make up my mind to take the job: 1. It paid more money than I would make as an attorney – at least for many years. 2. A friend of mine who worked for the company assured me that he would make sure I learned all I needed to do the job well despite not having experience in construction. 3. It came to me while praying that the Lord wanted me to take the job.

Two weeks after I began my new job in Hawaii, my friend who promised to watch over me was promoted to quality control manager, and I was given his job of production control manager. Now remember I had no experience in the construction business and took the job because my friend would be looking over my shoulder.  Before he moved out of my office he had shown me how and why our company was asking too little for the change from wood studs to steel studs. He suggested that it looked like they were only considering the cost of the steel over the cost of the wood and forgetting that the greater difficulty and expense of attaching materials such as the drywall to the steel. As I pursued this in the way suggested by my friend, the Navy became surprised that we were suddenly asking for three times the original amount for the change. They requested for a meeting to discuss the rational for the drastic increase.

Representing the company at this meeting were our project manger, the owner of the company, who was personally worth over 100 millions dollars in 1973 money, and me; and representing the government was the Navy captain in charge of all military construction in the Pacific and an Army major in charge of the project for the government.  I was the spokesperson for the company. 

Walking up the steps to the captain’s office in Pearl Harbor I was scared to death that they would discover that I totally unqualified for all this.  In my pocket were my rosary beads.  I put my fingers around one bead and said one Hail Mary. Immediately my fear was taken away and replaced by sheer peace.  In the office before the meeting begin, I remember looking around and being impressed with the long conference table, the gold on the captain uniform, and enjoying how all of it looked like something out of a movie.  During the meeting I was keenly focused and articulate. With ease I held my ground again strong arguments from both the major and the captain, and I even corrected the owner. Our project manager couldn’t wait to tell me after what a wonderful job I had done.  The owner was impressed too. A month or so later he decided that I should be sent around the country to oversee major change orders at his eleven other projects. Fortunately, my friend talked him out of it, as my lack of experience would have manifested itself for sure.

There is no doubt in my mind the one simple Hail Mary that I said before the meeting gave me the grace and peace to do what I could not do on my own. Mary is always here for us. As we draw closer to Christmas the Church ask us to turn to Mary our heavenly mother. She can help us be prepared and to open our hearts to all the graces of this holy season.  In these next five days before we celebrate the birth of our saviors let us turn to her.  Let us pray to her that the peace and joy that was present at her Sons birth be present to us this Christmas.

November 7, 2008, Friday of the 31st week in ordinary time.

My dad belonged to the Father’s Club when I was in High School.  He loved and highly respected the priest whose full time job was to oversee the club. This priest was a real man’s man, and not only my father but all the other dads looked up to him.  When he was asked why he became a priest he would answer that it was for one reason and one reason only, “to save my soul.”  My dad thought that was really great, and he was not shy at all about telling others why Father O’Gara became a priest.

 

With the dearth of vocations to the priesthood today it seems very few young men and woman of today factor such a reason into their decision as to what to do with their life.  I suspect the lesson in today’s Gospel was emphasized more back in the 1920s and 30s than it is today.

 

The lesson in today’s Gospel is very simple.  Christ wants the Christian to be as ingenious and give as much attention to the things which concern the salvation of his soul as the man of the world does to attaining money and comfort.

 

This is what St. Ignatius of Loyola suggested in his Spiritual Exercises:

 

        Man is created to praise, reverence, and serve God our Lord, and by this means to save his soul.

And the other things on the face of the earth are created for man and that they may help him in prosecuting the end for which he is created.

From this it follows that man is to use them as much as they help him on to his end, and ought to rid himself of them so far as they hinder him as to it.

For this it is necessary to make ourselves indifferent to all created things in all that is allowed to the choice of our free will and is not prohibited to it; so that, on our part, we want not health rather than sickness, riches rather than poverty, honor rather than dishonor, long rather than short life, and so in all the rest; desiring and choosing only what is most conducive for us to the end for which we are created

November 5, 2008, Wednesday of the 31st week in ordinary time.

Today my tinnitus is especially bad. My psychiatrist suggested that it might be the excitement of the elections.  I told him it is interesting that he would bring that up. Last night, early on, I felted peaceful watching the elections returns.  A few days before, with the reports that a third had voted early, and nineteen percent more had voted for Barack Obama than for John McCain, it became clear to me that the election to all intents and purpose was over - Obama would win for sure.  At around 7:30 PST, as the networks were waiting for the polls to close in Washington State, Oregon, and California, CBS said that their combined 77 votes could give Obama more than the 270 electoral votes needed to win. Still, I was peaceful.

 

Then, at exactly eight PM PST it was announced that Barrack Obama was the new President-elect of the United States of America.  Suddenly, over a quarter of a million people in Chicago’s Grant Park set off a gigantic explosion of excitment from utter elation.  The networks began to show this same kind of emotional response in various parts of the country.  Seeing in these crowds so many beautiful faces of African Americans beaming with joy as tears flowed from their eyes, I myself began tearing up. As I continued to watch this utterly joyful response, more and more tears came streaming down my face.  Before I knew it I was crying uncontrollably.  Going deep inside myself to get in touch with the place the tears were coming from, I discovered a feeling of pure joy. It felt so good seeing my African-American brothers and sisters, who had for so many years been the victims of massive, inexcusable, and grievously sinful racial prejudice, rejoicing over the election of a man of color to the most powerful office in the world.  After sharing this with my psychiatrist, he said that he had exactly the same reaction as mine. 

 

In the Gospel today we are told that there is more joy in heaven over one repentant sinner than over ninety-nine who have no need to repent.  We as a nation may not be fully repentant of our all our racial sins yet – there were sections of the south that voted more Republican this year than four years ago – but we sure came a long way last night.

 

The tears of joy that were shed last night by so many of us were, I believe, reflecting a similar joy in heaven.  Our heavenly Father, who sent Moses to free the Israelites from the oppression of the pharaoh, must be delighted with our election results.

 

A few months ago a pro-life parishioner shared with me that after her daughter had asked her to listen to one of Barack Obama’s speeches, she went outside to pray under the stars.  As she was praying she thought of Obama becoming president, and asked the Father if this was right. What she received may surprise some.  A voice came to her, “I am very please with this man.”   After what my heart felt last night, I believe God is indeed very pleased with President-elect Obama.

 

 

November 2, 2008, All Souls Day

 

A little two or three year old boy was playing with a ball as his uncle and mother sat on a near-by park bench.  The uncle was watching the boy play while the mother was reading a book.  When the boy’s ball rolled under the bench and disappeared in a gutter below, the boy immediately lost interest in the ball and turned to something else.  The uncle became concerned that there might be something wrong that he lost interest so easily. He pointed this out to the mother.  Her reply was, “Not to worry, Billy does not yet appreciate objective presence.”  What she meant was that for Billy, if you can’t see it, it does not exist.

 

Do you believe in ghost?   Friends of mine lived across the street from an old abandoned winery they plan to restore.  It was haunted by the ghost of the original owner who was killed there well over a hundred years ago.  One night after a nice dinner in their home and a few glasses of wine the husband took three potential investors to see the winery. It was dark so they had to use flash lights.  The men taunted the ghost. The following night the wife was home alone asleep when she heard several very loud explosions coming from her kitchen. She was too scared to go look at what it might be; she felt it had something to do with the ghost, and she was right.  The next morning she discovered pieces of exploded flash light batteries - only the ones used the night before - scattered all over the kitchen floor.

 

While they were telling me about this I could sense that my friends had become fearful of the ghost. What they once saw as harmless, and maybe something that made the winery more interesting, was now seen as a problem.  I told them that I would offer a mass for the ghost and that I was confident he would disappear for good.  The only thing I asked was they tell no one about this. After Mass was offered for the proper repose of the ghost, if it did indeed disappeared and people no longer saw or felt the ghost when they visited the old winery, I wanted us to know the ghost’s disappearance was due to the power of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, and not due to some psychological dynamic such as, “if you believe it is gone, it is gone.”

 

That was over a year ago. No one since then has seen or felt the ghost’s presence. It is gone.  This is far from the first time in my twenty-eight years as a priest that a ghost has disappeared for good after I said a Mass for him or her.

 

I believe it is very important that we pray for the dead.  St. John Vianney was often asked to pray for love ones who had died. Sometimes he answered that he would, and then sometimes he would say there is no need to pray for him or her, she is in heaven praying for you. We do not have the great saint’s gift. We do not know if our loved ones are in heaven or not.  Why take the chance of not remembering our deceased loved ones in our prayers, Masses, sufferings, and sacrifices.  I have no doubt that when we ourselves enter eternity, one of the first things that will be revealed to us will be how are prayers helped our relatives and friends who had been suffering in Purgatory.

 

Whatever you do, please, please be sure you arrange for a funeral mass for your deceased loved one – no matter what he or she may have requested. And, don’t forget, November is traditionally the month when Roman Catholics pray for the souls in Purgatory. St. Padre Pio wrote, “The holy souls are eager for the prayers of the faithful which can gain indulgences for them. Their intercession is powerful. Pray unceasingly.  We must empty Purgatory!”

 

November, 1, 2008, The Feast of All Saints.

The first reading on the feast of All Saints ends with, “Rejoice and be glad for your reward in heaven will be great.”   My brother, who happens to be a priest too, suffers from phlebitis. Last week it was causing him a lot of pain.  During his Holy Hour he brought his concerns about this to the Lord and was told, “Have the doctor threat this. It is not time for you to go to heaven yet; you still have work to do.  Last night a good friend of mine, a priest from Atlanta, called to tell me his best friend, another priest, died yesterday.  His friend was only sixty- nine. He was a really great priest – hard working, wise, and very loving.  It was his time to go to heaven.

 

Many years ago I invited a priest from New York by the name of Dennis Kelleher to come to the Bay Area to do a series of Masses for healing.   When he prayed over people sometimes they would fall backwards into the arms of a catcher who would gently allow them to fall to the floor – see the links on the left for a fuller explanation of this.  Once when I was resting in the spirit after he had prayed over me, I found myself having a conversation with Jesus.  He told me that since the time of my ordination I have been retired so to speak.  By this he meant that when I function as a priest it is not I who am working; it is He. So, when I am in the parlor giving someone spiritual direction, it is not me doing the directing but Him, when I am preaching it is not me preaching but Him, and so on.  Then He said the understanding that it is all His work and none of our own is the secret of the saints.

 

It seems that when we died we get a reward not for what we have done, but for what Jesus has done though us.  And, so today as we honor the saints, we are really not honoring them; we are honoring God who worked in them and though them.   Praise God!      

September 25, 2008, Thursday the 25th week in ordinary times

 

At the VA Hospital in San Francisco on Wednesdays I visit the patients in the pre-op room before surgery.  I usually will walk up, identify myself as the chaplain and ask the Veteran if he or she would like a prayer before surgery.  Well over fifty percent of the patients want prayers, and the vast majority of those who do not are very polite in their decline.  A few do get a little defensive and have to let me know they do not believe in prayer or God.  Yesterday, a Veteran’s response was to laugh hardly as though he was hearing a good joke.  So, I responded by laughing myself and agreeing that what I said was funny” The Vet obviously felt prayer was useless. 

 

This morning’s first reading from Ecclesiastes we hear Qoheleth saying, “All things are vanity” - in other words, “All things are useless.”  He said this because he did not believe in an afterlife.   For him there was nothing is new under the sun.

 

Why would this passage from Ecclesiastes be in the Bible, and why would the Catholic Church use it in the Mass?  I can only guess.  Perhaps it is to help us see how differently things look when we believe in an afterlife.  St. Ignatius felt that things have value in so far as they aid us on our path to salvation.  If they do not, then they are useless.  The things that are of value we need to keep, and the things that are vanity we need to avoid.  

 

Think of it this way.  You are swimming down a stream.  You come to a vortex in the middle of the river that can pull you under and so you swim around it.   In the same way, we need to use – and certainly not laugh at - the things in our life that lead us to salvation, and to avoid the things that do not, for they are vanity.

 

May 26, 2008, The Feast of Corpus Christi

 The feast of Corpus Christi was the doing of Juliana of Liege, a thirteenth-century nun, who claimed that God had been instructing her to establish a feast day commemorating the institution of the Eucharist during the Last Supper.  In 1237 her local bishop in response to her vision ordered a celebration of Corpus Christi to be held each year thereafter.  This celebration spread to other dioceses in Europe and on September 8, 1264, Pope Urban IV established the Feast of Corpus Christi as a universal feast of the Church, to be celebrated on the Thursday following Trinity Sunday.  Today in the United States the feast is celebrated on the Sunday after Trinity Sunday.

For centuries after, the feast was also celebrated with a Eucharistic procession, in which the Sacred Host was carried throughout the town, accompanied by hymns and litanies. The faithful would venerate the Body of Christ as the procession passed by. I remember in the 1940s going to my grandmother’s parish with my family and joining in the procession of the Blessed Sacrament around the streets of San Francisco.  As a small child I can’t begin to tell you how much that impressed me.  In recent years this practice has almost disappeared, though some parishes still hold a brief procession around the outside of the parish church.

Today the celebration of Corpus Christi, which means the Body of Christ in Latin, is needed more than every.  Less than thirty percent of Roman Catholics still believe that the consecrated host and wine at Mass are truly the Body, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ. 

About fifteen years ago I was preparing our second graders to receive their First Holy Communion.  At one point I asked the class of thirty seven year olds if the next day they would actually be receiving Jesus when for the first time they received Communion.  Six or seven of the children did not think so. I was startled.

I asked the young children why they did not believe they would be receiving Jesus.  Most of them had been instructed by their parents, or an aunt or uncle, not to believe. Some were told it was good to believe it was really Jesus, but actually it is just a piece of bread.

As you know, the definition of theology is faith seeking understanding.  I decide to turn these second graders into theologians.  I suggest that the next day immediately after receiving the consecrated host they return to their pews, kneel down, place their hands over their eyes, go into their hearts, and try very hard to tell if what they had just received was a piece of bread or Jesus Christ.  

On Monday when I asked how many felt it was just a piece of bread they received on Saturday, not one hand went up.   When I asked how many felt it was Jesus whom they received on Saturday, all thirty hands shot up without any hesitation, high and strong. Each and every one of them had no doubt whatsoever it was not a piece of bread but Jesus they received.  A price of bread simply cannot make you feel like that inside. 

If you read the description of the early Christians long before a Eucharistic theology was developed or the word transubstantiation was used, you will see they had the exact same faith in the Eucharist as those second graders at St. Anselm’s Church.

St. Ignatius of Antioch: "I have no taste for the food that perishes nor for the pleasures of this life. I want the Bread of God which is the Flesh of Christ, who was the seed of David; and for drink I desire His Blood which is love that cannot be destroyed." 100 A.D

St. Justin Martyr: "This food we call the Eucharist, of which no one is allowed to partake except one who believes that the things we teach are true, and has received the washing for forgiveness of sins and for rebirth, and who lives as Christ handed down to us. For we do not receive these things as common bread or common drink; but as Jesus Christ our Savior being incarnate by God's Word took flesh and blood for our salvation, so also we have been taught that the food consecrated by the Word of prayer which comes from him, from which our flesh and blood are nourished by transformation, is the flesh and blood of that incarnate Jesus." 150 A.D.

St. Irenaeus of Lyon: [Christ] has declared the cup, a part of creation, to be his own Blood, from which he causes our blood to flow; and the bread, a part of creation, he has established as his own Body, from which he gives increase to our bodies. 180 A.D.

St Ephraim: And extending His hand, He gave them the Bread which His right hand had made holy: 'Take, all of you eat of this; which My word has made holy. Do not now regard as bread that which I have given you; but take, eat this Bread, and do not scatter the crumbs; for what I have called My Body, that it is indeed. One particle from its crumbs is able to sanctify thousands and thousands, and is sufficient to afford life to those who eat of it. Take, eat, entertaining no doubt of faith, because this is My Body, and whoever eats it in belief eats in it Fire and Spirit. But if any doubter eat of it, for him it will be only bread. And whoever eats in belief the Bread made holy in My name, if he be pure, he will be preserved in his purity; and if he be a sinner, he will be forgiven.' But if anyone despise it or reject it or treat it with ignominy, it may be taken as certainty that he treats with ignominy the Son, who called it and actually made it to be His Body.", 350 A.D.

St. Athanasius: This bread and this wine, so long as the prayers and supplications have not taken place, remain simply what they are. But after the great prayers and holy supplications have been sent forth, the Word comes down into the bread and wine - and thus His Body is confected." 373 A.D.

Unfortunately, other Christian denominations do not share in this same rich Eucharistic tradition.   A few years ago I went to Jacksonville for a week of healing prayer at Francis and Judith MacNutt’s Christian Healing Ministries.  When the sessions were over at four in the afternoon, I would go immediately to Marywood Catholic Retreat House for a night of quiet prayer.  For me it was a week of being prayed over for healing during the day and spending time alone praying with the Blessed Sacrament at night.  I wanted to include in this the Mass, but unless I were to say it by myself, this would not be possible - I was the only guest that week at the retreat house.  A few years before a priest friend of mine had told me that we priests now have permission from the pope to say a private mass, something that I had not done in all my years as priest. 

The first morning at seven o’clock I celebrated Mass alone in the Marywood chapel.  It felt very strange saying, “The Lord be with you” and having no one respond. All during the mass I keep wondering, “Is this a valid Mass?”  After Communion I sat down and silently went into my heart, just as I had instructed the second graders at St. Anselm’s. I can tell you without a doubt the pope was right in allowing priests to say Mass alone.  I found my heart was filled with the same loving presence of Jesus that it is every time I receive Holy Communion - a presence that cannot be given by bread, but a Real Presence.  Yes, yes, it was a valid Mass.

Later in the morning at the healing center we were invited to celebrate the Lord’s Supper together. The celebrant was an Episcopalian priest.  Before Mass he shared that he understood that Catholics were not allowed by their Church to receive Communion in a non-Catholic churches, but that many Catholic priests had been to these mass and received, and once even a Roman Catholic bishop received.  He wanted the Catholics present to know they were welcomed to receive at this mass.  Earlier I had introduced myself as a priest and I felt that after what this man had just shared, love demanded that I accept his invitation to receive at his Mass.  After receiving the host and while going back to my pew I recalled the powerful experience of receiving at Marywood just a few hours earlier.  I sat in my pew and again went into my heart, just as I had done at my private mass.  What I felt at this Mass was different.  I felt a spiritual, holy, and beautiful presence of Jesus, but it was not the Real Presence. 

Suddenly, I become the great Eucharistic theologian.  The Catholic Church believes that in the Eucharist the bread and wine are actually transformed objectively, and become in a real sense the body and blood of Christ. The consecrated elements retain the forms of bread and wine, but are in reality the actual body and blood of Christ.  At my private Mass in Marywood that is exactly what I felt.  The Protestant Churches has traditionally seen the Eucharist as being only a symbolic or spiritual presence of Jesus. And, that is exactly what I felt receiving in the Protestant Church a few hours later.  My experience that morning in Jacksonville had perfectly matched the theology of the two Churches. 

When I was pastor of a small parish in western Marin and at the same involved in a very powerful healing ministry, a famous Buddhist monk from Burma came to visit me.  First, I took him around our buildings and grounds.  When we walked into the small Blessed Sacrament chapel in our office building, the monk immediately dropped to his knees in front to the tabernacle in profound adoration.  He remained in veneration for over a minute.   The irony of the moment was inescapable: vast numbers of Catholics walk into church today without showing the slightest indication that the Real Presence of Our Savior of the world is right there in front of them.  Yet, here was a monk from a completely different tradition and faith giving the most beautiful, moving, and powerful veneration to the Blessed Sacrament that I have ever seen.

Right now, at this very moment, and at every moment, the Person who loves us more than anyone else in the world is waiting to touch the depths of our hearts with His love.  He can be found, literally found, in each and every Catholic church in the world.  Yes, he is waiting for us in our own parish church.  On this feast of Corpus Christi let us respond to His incredible passion for us by making a visit to the Blessed Sacrament. Let’s sit with the Lover for a good period of time.  He will fill us with a love that is beyond description.  We will leave thanking Him for His ineffabale invitation and for the grace to have accepted it.  And, even better, let’s makes everyday the feast of Corpus Christi.  For each time we visit the Blessed Sacrament we are drawn deeper and deeper into his eternal Love.

 

 

 

March 27, 2008, Thursday in the Octave of Easter

In today’s reading from the Acts of the Apostle we hear that the people, gathered at the Beautiful Gate, in response to Peter and John’s healing of the crippled man “hurried in amazement toward them.”  Peter immediately set the record straight.  It was not by his own power that the man was healed, but by Jesus’.  “And by faith in his name, this man, whom you see and know, his name has made strong, and the faith that comes through it has given him this perfect health, in the presence of all of you.”  A few years ago my physician told me that I should not pray over others for healing because it was my energy alone, being transferred to the person by my touch, that healed them. This surprised me as I have always felt the way that Peter did, that if anyone was healed by my touch and prayers it come not from me but from Jesus.   After I challenged his belief that these healings by touch were not coming from God, he decided to do a little experiment to prove that he was right. 

 

He asked if the following week I would bring someone from my parish that I had been praying over for healing and he would measure the amount of energy coming from me as I laid hands on the person.   This doctor had an unusual gift.  He was able to measure his patient’s energy by slowly moving his hand towards the patient’s body.  Where his hands felt the energy he would stop.  If his hands were far from the body when this happened the person energy was high that day and if his hand got close to the body it meant the patient’s energy was low that day.

 

The following week I brought a woman from my parish with me who had cancer.   The doctor first spent two or three minutes measuring my energy in various parts of my body.  He used a ruler for this and then wrote the measurement down.  Next he asked me to lay my hands on the parishioner and pray for healing.  During this time he measured my energy again.  Lastly he told me to stop praying and he measured my energy a third time.   After, with a look of amazement, he studied his findings, suggested I sit down, and then he said, “This is not what I expected at all.  Before you prayed your energy was about fifty percent.  As you began to pray your energy dropped to twenty-five percent just as I had expected.  But then suddenly it increased to seventy-five percent and stayed like that all the while you were praying.  When you stopped praying it returned to exactly where it was before you began praying.”

 

I believe that when we lay hands on the sick and ask Jesus to heal them, His healing love begins to flow through us into the other person.  And it is His love that heals.  This gift is available to every baptized Christian.  Why are you not using your healing gift for the good of your sisters or brothers?  It is so beautiful, so simple, so easy, so loving, so Christ-like.

 

 

March 8, 2008, Saturday of the fourth week of Lent

A few years ago at a healing workshop in Jacksonville I had an interesting conversation with a Protestant woman.  She attends daily Mass with a Catholic friend who told her that as a Protestant she was not allowed to receive Holy Communion, but she could come forward for a blessing.  One morning at the very moment the priest blessed her the Holy Spirit revealed to her that the hosts in the ciborium were in fact the Body, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ.  Unfortunately, most Roman Catholics – perhaps as many as seventy percent - don’t believe what this holy Protestant woman was shown by God during that blessing.   They don’t believe in the Real Presence.  So, it is good that Archbishop Albert Malcolm Ranjith of the Congregation of Worship at the Vatican plans to set some new guidelines to bring back "dignity and decorum" to the Mass. 

One change he is proposing may not be wise though.  He wants to ban Communion in the hands and only allow Communion on the tongue.  Today too many Catholics receive Communion too infrequently to know how to receive it properly on the tongue.  Some have become what I call “snatchers”; they move their mouths forward as the priest attempts to place the host on their tongue and then they sort of snatch the host out of the priest's hands.  The poor priest is left with saliva on his fingers and, unless he wipes it off on his vestments, the saliva can be transferred onto the next host and into the mouth of the next communicant.  

Unfortunately, even some daily communicants are “snatcher”.  But, at least the priest usually knows who they are and he knows to quickly move his hands back at the moment they move their mouths forward, thus landing the host squarely on the tongue without his fingers touching it.  Let's pray that Archbishop Ranjith finds a more creative way of solving the problem of lack of respect for the Real Presence than bringing back mandatory reception of Holy Communion on the tongue.  And please, if you do receive on the tongue, close your eyes for a second, keep your head still, and trust that the priest will place the host on your tongue without your help.

 

February 17, 2008, Sunday of the second week of Lent

 

Born to nobility in Florence in 1522 St. Catherine di Ricci was your typical Italian renaissance mystic.  As a child she was considered a holy girl and at a very early age she wanted to join the Dominican Sisters in near-by Prado.   He parents wanted her to marry but she refused and eventually she was given permission to join the convent.  There she had many mystical experiences including the “Ecstasy of the Passion” every Thursday from noon until Friday at 4:00 p.m. for twelve years.   This included the stigmata and all the pain of the passion of Our Lord.

 

Once, the local duchess came to Catherine and asked for prayers for her husband the duke.  He had a mistress and was not a nice man.  The duchess loved him nonetheless and wanted him to be saved and not to suffer too much in purgatory.  When the man died Catherine asked the Lord to let her suffer the pains of Purgatory in his place.  Her sisters, loving her so much, knowing how holy she was, and how much good she had done, could not stand seeing her suffer such extreme pain.  One of the sisters begged her to ask for the pain to be taken away.  Catherine replied to the sister, “Pardon me my sisters if I answer you. Jesus has so much love for souls that all we do for them is infinitely agreeable to him.  That is why I endure any pain whatsoever it may be for the conversion of sinners as well as the deliverance of the souls detained in purgatory.”

 

Her brother Andrew lived a wild life and on his death bed refused the last rites.  In a vision after his death Catherine saw that her brother had been condemned to Hell.  But, then Jesus said to her, “I do not condemn anyone to Hell, I came to save the sinner.  I did not condemn your brother to Hell.  Your brother freely chose to go to there.”  Catherine said that God honors our free will to the point that He even allows us to choose Hell. 

 

The convent she lived in was built in the sharp of a cross, but the right wing of the horizontal portion was much longer than the vertical wing.  Our Lord told her that the shorter wing was like his justice and the longer wing like his mercy.

 

In one ecstasy she received a wedding ring from Jesus when He made her his bride.  He said to Catherine, “Take this ring as a pledge and proof that you will now and forever belong to me.” She described it as having small diamonds and a beautiful red stone.  Some of her sisters saw what looked like a red ring under her skin – today some claim the sisters were only seeing an infection on Catherine’s ring finger.  St. Catherine of Ricci practice of attending on the sick was usually performed on her knees and she tenderly cared for the poor over the whole country. 

 

Something like what St. Austin related in the life of St. John of Egypt happened to St. Catherine of Ricci and her spiritual friend St. Philip Neri.   After having for some time exchanged letters, and to satisfy their mutual desire of seeing each other, while he was detained at Rome, she began to appear to him in visions or while bilocating.  This allowed them to converse with each other at great length.   St. Philip Neri, who was most circumspect in giving credit to or in publishing visions, declared, saying that Catherine di Ricci, while still living, had appeared to him in visions.  And this was confirmed by the oaths of five witnesses.  When shown a painting of Catherine, Philip said she was far more beautiful in person.

 

Catherine prayed often to St Thecla, a first century martyr from Iconium who had received the faith directly from St. Paul.   He taught her about the one, true God.  Thecla also learned from him that a young woman can become the bride of Christ if she gives up marriage. By this time, Thecla desired nothing else than to give herself entirely to God.  Thecla's pagan parents tried their best to make her give up her Christian faith, but she would not. Her fiancé, Thamyris, begged her not to break their engagement. However, Thecla had made up her mind. She wanted to be Christ's bride, not his. At last, in great anger, Thamyris accused her to the judge. When she still refused to give up her love for Jesus, she was ordered to be burned to death.  St. Catherine was always going into ecstasy and her work was never getting done.  She prayed to St. Thecla to help her with this.  Thecla did some magnificent embroidering for Catherine.  At the convent in Prato you will find her beautiful work of art.  The detail and lines are absolutely perfect except for a small patch in the lower right hand corner which was done not by Thecla, but by Catherine.

 

After a long illness St. Catherine died on the feast of the Purification of our Lady, on the 2nd of February, in 1589 at the age of 76.  She was canonized by Pope Benedict XIV in 1746.  Her feast day is February 13th.

 

Anneli Rufus, a prize-winning journalist and poet, in her very interesting and worthwhile book Magnificent Corpses, writes this about Catherine di Ricci,  “With her lifelong commitment to self-mutilation, begun when she was a young girl, Catherine exemplifies a whole genre of saints – most of them female.  They share a penchant for childhood prayer, childhood penances such as sleeping on cold castle floors.  She trains herself to withstand yet more pain, hair shirts, the whip, and no food.

 

As she grows, the saint cares for the sick.  Often this means proselytizing individuals who are too weak to protest, too ill to ignore intimations of Heaven and Hell.  It was not nursing as we know it.  Part of the appeal lay in performing nauseous chores: swabbing the patients’ running sores, scrubbing their fetid lines.  While kindness is to be commended, these saints found in such tasks a way to punish their own senses, perhaps even die.

 

Catherine lived in time when convents were the only outlet for a girl who felt and acted oddly.  And she flourished in a structure that not only praised her odd behaviors but rewarded them with names.  Starving is ‘fasting.’  Whips are ‘disciplines.’ Self-mutilation is ‘penitence.’  Suicidal tendencies are channeled into longings for martyrdom, such as those that inspirited Therese of Lisieux.  Erotic daydreams, as in the story of Gemma Galgani, are “demonic temptations.”  Altered states and what you might call hallucinations are ‘visions’ and ecstasies’.”

 

So, we have the modern speculations of a Rufus and the ancient straight-forward accounts of Catherine’s hagiographers. Which one is closer to the truth?  Perhaps we can get a little help in finding the answer by looking at the Transfiguration (Mt. 17:1-9).  I have never heard or read of anyone speaking of this event in the life of Jesus in these terms, but I believe the Transfiguration was a mystical prayer experience of Jesus in which three of his apostles, Peter, James, and John, were drawn in.  And, if this is correct, then the Transfiguration may help us determine legitimate mystical experiences from neurotic desires and psychotic behavior, and so, whether Catherine was, so to speak, a true nut case or a saint.

 

  1. And he was transfigured before them; his face shone like the sun and his clothes became white as light. Sometimes our perception of reality can change during prayer.  We can see and hear things that are not ordinarily available to our senses or see a distorted view of reality.  A mystical theologian would call the perception of the clothes becoming “white as light” a classical prayer experience; a psychologist would call it an illusion.  Catherine’s visions and locutions would  indicate some kind of pathology to the psychologist, but being that she was a cloistered nun whose very profession was to pray and to seek the numinous, her visions and locutions would indicated some kind of holiness to the mystical theologian.
  2. And behold, Moses and Elijah appeared to them, conversing with him.  Anneli Rufus does not comment on Catherine’s friendship with a dead person, St Thecla, but I suspect that this only gave her more reason to question Catherine’s sanity. Many Protestants would have difficulty with Catherine praying to a dead person too.  In fact, most Protestant churches strongly reject all saintly intercession.  The Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England condemned the invocation of saints as "a fond thing, vainly invented, and grounded upon no warranty of Scripture, but rather repugnant to the Word of God.”  Yet, in the Transfiguration, which comes from the Word of God, we see Jesus conversing with Moses and Elijah – two dead people - not unlike Catherine conversing with Thecla, or you and I asking for intercessions from our favorite saint.  Again, we have one interpretation from a secular point of view and another from a spiritual/Scriptural point of view.  
  3. “Then from the cloud came a voice that said, ‘This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him.”  This gives us the best clue as to whether a devotee’s numinous experiences in prayer are real or not.  Does her prayer help her believe that Jesus is the only Son of God?  And, even more important, is the person listening to Jesus?  In other words, is she living the Gospels by loving her neighbor?  We know that Catherine loved Jesus as her Lord and Savior and from this love came a tremendous desire to comfort the sick and work with the poor.  Perhaps Ms. Rufus thinks this enthusiasm is only more proof that Catherine was neurotic, but the spiritual person would see this as proof that Catherine’s visions and locutions were real and from God.

 

Someone once said there is a very fine line between sanctity and insanity.  Those of you with rich spiritual lives, perhaps you should take it as a compliment when other think of you are as a little strange – or as an indication that you need therapy.

 

February 11, 2008, Feast of Our Lady of Lourdes

Today is the 150th anniversary of the apparitions of Mary to St. Bernadette at Lourdes, France.  I would like to share with you a few thoughts on apparitions. 

 

A Marian apparition is an event in which the Virgin Mary is supposed to have supernaturally appeared to one or more persons, typically Catholics, in various settings.  There have been more than eighty thousands reported apparitions of Mary worldwide, yet only nine have been officially approved by the Catholic Church.  They are La Salette, Lourdes, Knock, Guadalupe, Fatima, Banneux, Beauraning, Rue du Bac and Pontmain.  Their approval simply means that a Catholic may devoutly believe that Mary once appeared there. It does not mean the Church believes she did.  Pope Pius X gave an explanation in Lamentabili sane exitu issued 3 July 1907, concerning Modernism: In passing judgment on pious traditions. . . the Church uses the greatest prudence . . . Even then she does not guarantee the truth of the fact narrated; she simply does not forbid belief. . . On this matter the Sacred Congregation of Rites, thirty years ago, decreed as follows: ‘These apparitions and revelations [of La Salette and Lourdes] have neither been approved nor condemned by the Holy See. It has simply allowed that they be devoutly believed by purely human faith, according to the tradition which they relate.” 

There is very good reason for this caution.  Seventeen years ago thousands of people from around the world flocked to St. Dominic’s Catholic Church in Colfax, California to see an apparition of the Virgin Mary on a stained glass window.  This, despite the warning of the local priests that the apparition began the day after a tree was cut down in the church parking lot.  Pilgrims were lined up around the block as the little church overflowed week after week.  There were long lines for confessions, rosary beads were miraculously changing into gold, and many were being healed.  A parishioner of mine had her back healed while praying before the apparition.  Even the local bishop visited the apparition and said, “For those who believe, no explanation is necessary and for those who do not believe, no explanation is possible.”

             On December 11, 1990, after the first cloudy day in northern California in months, the San Francisco Chronicle reported, “A mysterious light on a church wall that many believed was a divinely inspired image of the Virgin Mary did not appear yesterday amid heavy clouds, seeming to confirm the theory it was merely sunlight shining through a stained-glass window ... When the image failed to appear at its customary time, however, the worshipers trooped out, some in dismay.”

          Perhaps the most controversial apparition in the history of the Church has been taking place in Medjugorje, Bosnia-Herzegovina during the last twenty-six years. The Blessed Virgin Mary reportedly first appeared to 16-year-old Mirjana Dragicevic on June 24, 1981 as she was walking casually with her girlfriend Ivanka Ivankovic, 17, near a hilltop known as Podprado at a village called Medjugorje in what once was Yugoslavia. Since that time, both girls and four of their young friends have been seeing this vision of the Virgin Mary regularly, often on a daily basis.

             Here is an eye-witness account of one of the more commonly reported miracles at Medjugorje. "I had just come out of Mass. The sun as over Mount Krisevac, a hill where people pray every day and where Mary has actually appeared. All of a sudden I saw a crowd of people with their faces in awe, and gold light on their faces. I turned and looked and the sun was spinning across the sky, with great rainbows of light coming out of it. Rainbows of light were most prominently on the cross. You could stare straight into the sun and you did not have to blink. It did not hurt your eyes. And then all of a sudden it came back and was a normal sun again.”

             After three years of study, the former Bishops' Conference of Yugoslavia on April 10, 1991 published their declaration.  Among other things it stated: "On the basis of investigations up till now it cannot be established that one is dealing with supernatural apparitions and revelations."  The Vatican will allow Catholics to visit Medjugorje on their own and to take their priest with them for confessions, but it has told bishops that their parishes and dioceses may not organize official pilgrimages to the site of the alleged Marian apparitions.  The local bishop, Most Rev. Peric Ratko Peric of Mostar-Duvno, vehemently opposes claims that Mary has appeared in the village almost 40,000 times in the last 26 years. Just last year he complained personally to Pope Benedict XVI that priests from overseas were ignoring the wishes of the local bishops not to go on pilgrimages there.  He said,  "As the local bishop, I maintain that regarding the events of Medjugorje, on the basis of the investigations and experience gained thus far throughout these last 25 years, the church has not confirmed a single apparition as authentically being the Madonna.”  

             I have been to Fatima and Lourdes, the two most famous approved Marian apparitions.   There is something very special about Lourdes.  One might go so far as to say that if you could visit only one place in all of Europe it should be Lourdes.  There is a tradition there that you might not experience a healing, but you will always receive a gift.  My first time at Lourdes the gift was a powerful experience in the Reconciliation Chapel.  The second time, while falling asleep the final night after a three-day stay, I realized that on this visit there would be no gift.  However, the next morning I was suddenly awoken at exactly six in the morning. When the Holy Spirit wakes you up you know it.  You are suddenly wide awake as though you had never been asleep.  I got up and walked to the shrine where it is crowded with pilgrims during the day.  Here, very early in the morning, I was all alone at the exact spot where Mary appeared to St. Bernadette.  It was very powerful moment for me, my gift from Mary.

             Fatima was quite a bit different from Lourdes.  I did not feel anything special there and came away doubting.  There was one interesting thing though.  The two great miracles of Fatima were the dancing sun, which was seen miles beyond Fatima, and the instantaneous drying of the people’s rain soaked-clothes during the dancing sun.  The first miracle is explained by the dynamics of mass hysteria and the second by the warm summer Portugal sun.  Well, while at Fatima, I decided to test the second explanation.  It was a very hot day in June, over 110 degrees.  You needed an umbrella to sit or stand in the sun even for a moment.  I used a fountain to soak my shirt with water.  If the skeptics were correct, the hot sun would dry it immediately.  An hour later my shirt was still somewhat damp, as one more well thought-out explanation from the skeptics slowly vanished in thin air.

 

 

February 8, 2008, Friday after Ash Wednesday

 

Several years ago I was the Catholic chaplain on a cruise ship from Puerto Rico to Lisbon.   With me was a close friend whose business was suffering because of the real estate collapse of the early 1990s.  Sitting across from us for meals was the rabbi and his wife.  The four of us became friends very quickly.  In one of our conversations about the poor economy the rabbi told my friend that there are always seven bad years and seven good years and that during the good years we need to prepare for the bad ones.  In today’s Gospel Jesus says “The days will come when the bridegroom is taken away from them, and then they will fast.”

 

There are times when the bridegroom seems to be in our lives and times that he does not.  I think of Mother Teresa. Throughout 1946 and 1947, she experienced a profound union with Christ.  On September 10, 1946 on a train to Darjeeling in India she received what she described as "the call within the call".   Mother Teresa said, "I was to leave the convent and work with the poor, living among them. It was an order. I knew where I belonged but I did not know how to get there."    From that intimacy with the bridegroom she quite the Sisters of Loreto and teaching school in Calcutta, founded the Sisters of Charity, and dedicate her entire life to working for the poorest of the poor.. But soon after she began her work among the destitute and dying on the street, the visions and locutions ceased, and she experienced a spiritual darkness that would remain with her until her death.   In the midst of this dryness she wrote” “There are so many religions and each one has its different ways of following God. I follow Christ: Jesus is my God, Jesus is my Spouse, Jesus is my Life, Jesus is my only Love, Jesus is my All in All; Jesus is my Everything.”

 

It is important that we develop good strong spiritual lives when we experience the Bridegroom in our lives, for there will come a time when He seems to be taken away.  It may not last as long as fifty years, as it did for Mother Teresa, but no matter the length it will seem long and difficult. Without the graces obtained when the Bridegroom is with us, we can lose our resolve.   In other words, it is easy to practice and believe when we are enjoying spiritual fervor and the light, it can be very difficult when the well seems to be dry and darkness has come upon us.  Be prepared you do not know when this is going to happen.

 

 

February 7, 2008, Thursday after Ash Wednesday

 

The other day a parishioner asked me why she was always getting her feelings hurt by friends, relatives, and even priests.  Normally if someone were to ask me that question I would think the person had a problem, for few of us are getting our feelings hurt all the time.  But, I had known this woman for many years, and knew her to be very well balance, spiritual, holy, and close to God.  She has a big heart, and much to give, but it seemed that many people who did not want her love or gifts were always coming into her life and rejecting her.  So, I told her, “It is because Jesus wants you to share in his sufferings and in this way have you draw even closer to him.  You are a very special person in the Kingdom.”

 

In today’s Gospel Jesus said to his disciples: “The Son of Man must suffer greatly and be rejected by the elders, the chief priests, and the scribes, and be killed and on the third day be raised.” (Luke 9:25)  We can read this over very quickly and not get the connection between the words “suffering” and “rejected”.  We associate Jesus’ physical pain, such as the scourging at the pillar, the crowing of thrones, and the crucifixion with his suffering, but we sometimes fail to associate the emotional pain, such as being reject by the very people he wanted to save, with his suffering. 

 

When our love is rejected, especially by someone we care about and want to make happy, we are suffering just what Jesus did.  Our hurt it is an opportunity for us to appreciate what Jesus experienced, to associate our suffering with his, and to offer it up for the salvation of the world

 

March 21, 2007, Wednesday of the Fourth Week of Lent

 

A good, holy woman was asked to leave her sister’s home, where she had been staying for a few months while work was being done on her home.  It seems that her sister and brother-in-law were upset because she questioned the fact that their twenty-four year old daughter was having sex with her boy friend in her basement bedroom.  Her sister held that this is perfectly accepted behavior today.  

 

What confused the woman most was that this was not the way their parents had raised them.  Her sister and her husband didn’t have sex until they were married.  But that was 35 years ago.  

 

Who was right, the woman or the sister?  The answer should be obvious.  Would the sister get on a 747 flying from San Francisco to New York if the odds of it landing safely were the same odds as the birth control pill working?  I don’t think so. No method of birth control works more than 98 or 99 per cent of the time. That is one reason why there are so many abortions

 

Would the sister want her grandchild aborted?  Would she want her grandchild raised without the love of both a mother and father in an intact family?  Would she want her grandchild put up for adoption and never be able to see her grow up?  If there is any love in her, the answers are no, no, and no.  Yet, she has no problem with her daughter having sex with her boy friend.  She even provides the bed for them to do it in.  And, when her loving sister questions this she asks her to move out.  How can the sister’s behavior possibly be defended?

 

There is probably not too much worse in the eyes of the Creator that you can do than engage in the act that creates human life (having sex) when you and your partner have neither the ability nor the intention of nurturing to the fullest the sacred, precious, human life that may come form it.  In today’s Gospel Jesus said, “I cannot do anything on my own; I judge as I hear, and my judgment is just, because I do not seek my own will but the will of the one who sent me.”  I think if we were more aware that at the judgment we will have to account for our actions before the Almighty, unmarried couples would think twice about having sex outside of marriage, and adults would insist that their children, no matter what age, live by traditional values, at least in their own home. 

 

March 13, 2007, Tuesday of the Third Week of Lent

 

If every time someone visits your home he insults your wife would you have to forgive him seventy times seven if he asked for forgiveness?  Yes you would, but this does not mean you would have keep inviting him to your home.  If you steal my motorcycle I will forgive you, but that does not necessarily mean you be given the keys once more to take it for a ride.  If someone has hurt you in a relationship, and asked for forgiveness, you are called to forgive her.  But you are not required to reestablish the relationship.  Forgiveness has to do with what is in your heart.  If the memory of the hurt is fading, no longer causes you to lose your peace, and you truly wish the person well, you have most likely forgiven the person.  After that only common sense is required.

 

March 12, 2007, Monday of the Third Week of Lent

 

 

 

March 13, 2007, Tuesday of the Third Week of Lent

 

If every time someone visits your home he insults your wife would you have to forgive him seventy times seven if he asked for forgiveness?  Yes you would, but this does not mean you would have keep inviting him to your home.  If you steal my motorcycle I will forgive you, but that does not necessarily mean you be given the keys once more to take it for a ride.  If someone has hurt you in a relationship, and asked for forgiveness, you are called to forgive her.  But you are not required to reestablish the relationship.  Forgiveness has to do with what is in your heart.  If the memory of the hurt is fading, no longer causes you to lose your peace, and you truly wish the person well, you have most likely forgiven the person.  After that only common sense is required.

 

March 12, 2007, Monday of the Third Week of Lent

 

A famous Buddhist monk from Burma visited me when I was pastor of Sacred Heart Church in Olema.  Before we sat down to discuss things like prayer and healing, I showed him around the parish property.  In the church he asked me though his interpreter why no one used a particular room.  I did not know which room he meant until he said the room where people tell the truth.  I said, “Oh you mean where people confess their sins.”  He said, “Yes, why is it not used?”  I said, “That is my fault.  I have not done a good job of teaching people the importance of going to confession.”  He said, “You must tell them it is the place where God forgives sins.” 

 

At Sacred Heart there were no scheduled confessions until I become pastor.  But that did not last long. Despite a few a few homilies on the need and benefits of the wonderful sacrament of reconciliation, no one came, and in time I stopped manning the confessional. While pastor there I would leave Olema once a month for a different part of the country to give a parish mission.  On the second evening of the mission the theme was penance and healing.  After that mission talk several priests were always needed to hear the many confessions, and the next day I would be I in the confessional for hours.

 

How do you explain this?  It was the same priest, saying the same things in both places, but with two different results.  Jesus gives us the answer in today’s Gospel, “No prophet is accepted in his own county.”  He could have said “In his own parish.”  Pastors, no matter how gifted they are, need from time to time to invite priests from the outside help minister to their people.  It is an excellent policy to periodically switch pulpits with neighboring pastors, and at least once a year to have a parish mission. 

 

March 9, 2006, Friday of the Second Week of Lent

 

The story of Joseph and his brothers is my favorite story in the Old Testament.  What his brothers did to him was terrible.  He was left in a cistern and picked up by travelers and taken to another country.  While there he was unjustly put in prison.  At the time poor Joseph must have been thinking his life was over and wondering if there was really a God.  But all along God was working in his life.  As you know the Pharaoh was not able to find anyone who could interpret his dream of the fat cows and the thin cows.  Finally because of his gift, Joseph was taken from prison to the Pharaoh to interpret the dream.  He told him that there would be seven good years and seven bad years.  Food needed to be stored during the seven good years for the seven bad ones.

 

When the seven bad years came the Pharaoh put Joseph in charge of distributing the food.  This made Joseph the second most powerful person in Egypt. It was then that his brothers came to his new country to buy food.   After Joseph finally let his brothers know who he was he said, "The evil you intended to do to me God turned into good.”

 

There is a part of Joseph’s story in all of our lives.  Things sometimes turn for the worse.  They don’t go the way we had hoped, wanted, or imagined.  Perhaps it was because others have not treated us fairly.  It does not matter.  In those moments we need to not feel sorry for ourselves, but to trust that God will turn the bad into good.

 

March 7, 2007, Wednesday of the Second Week of Lent

 

In response to their mother’s request that they sit on the right and left of Jesus in the kingdom, James and John are asked by Jesus, Can you drink the chalice that I am going to drink?”  Jesus was referring to his suffering.  This is where we get the expression cup of suffering.  It is the text that supports the Christian belief that suffering can have eschatological value.

 

Pope John Paul II comes to mind. Remember his last public appearance?  It was at the Sunday angelus with thousands of people below in St. Peter’s Square and him standing above at his window.  He tried and tried to speak but could not.  In total frustration he pounded both fists on the podium.  He had so much to give but his body wouldn’t let him. He wanted to live; he wanted to serve.  The pain of it all must have been greater than any pain he was experiencing at that moment in his dying body.

 

Since Pope John Paul’s death there have been reports all over the world of his appearing to people and prayers being answered though his intercession.  It is very much like St. Teresa and St. Pio, each of whom also had their cup of suffering while on earth, and many miracles attributed to their intercessions after their death in heaven.

 

Not all suffering is good.  But when it comes our way there is the possibility, if we are so blessed, that it is an invitation to draw closer to God not only in this life but in the next. 

 

March 6, 2007, Tuesday of the Second Week of Lent

 

At a non-denominational Charismatic prayer meeting someone addressed a Catholic priest as sir and offered that he himself did not call anyone on earth “father” because Jesus told us not too.  I think the man was wrong. It is true that in today’s Gospel Jesus tell us not to call others teacher, rabbi, master, or father.  But from the rest of the text it is clear the problem is with those who feel superior because of the title. So yes, when we perceive that a priest is taking pride in the title we do need top calling him father.  Other then that it is a very good thing to do.  

 

My doctor asked me to call him Bruce rather than doctor.  He said it bothers him that some doctors insist on being addressed as doctor while calling everyone else by their first name.  I told him that as long as he is treating me I will address him as doctor.  The title is a powerful message to my unconscious that this man can heal me.  I need him to be a doctor much more than a friend named Bruce.  We cheat ourselves when we call doctors, priests, ministers, and other people in our service by their first name. The biggest mistake by far is made by those few who call their parents by their first name. 

 

 

March 3, 2007, Saturday of the First Week of Lent

 

St. Anselm Church in Ross, where I lived for nine years, is perhaps the most ideal setting for a church wedding in the whole world.   Some couples chose to be married there only because of its beauty.  During marriage preparations a few would strongly argue against the need of participating in the life of the church.  When it would get to the point where it was obvious that they did not value organized religion, I would ask why they wanted a church wedding.  The most common reply was, "Our love is special and deserves more than a civil ceremony."  At that point I would take my collar off, throw it on the floor, and say, "You have convinced me, I am quitting the priesthood.  All the other priests agree too and they are leaving.  There are no more priests.  The laity also feels the same way as you about the Church.  They have stopped attending mass and financially supporting the Church.  So, the ideal church building you are planning to have you wedding in no longer exist, there are no Catholic schools for your children to attend, no one to minister the sacraments to your dying parents and so on."

This "just God and me" mentality is growing at a rapid rate.  Large numbers of American adults are disaffiliating themselves from Christianity and from other organized religions. 14.1% do not follow any organized religion. This is almost a doubling -- from only 8% in 1990. There are more Americans who say they are not affiliated with any organized religion than there are Episcopalians, Methodists, and Lutherans taken together.

Recently a man wrote a letter to the editor of our local newspaper attacking organized religion.  He claimed that he stops into a Catholic church on his way to work each morning to enjoy the peace and quiet.  One morning he saw a homeless man ask for help and be rebuffed.  Then a church worker came by and forced the homeless man to leave.  This scene reaffirmed the writer’s negative attitude towards organized religion.  

 

Reading the letter the first thing that came to my mind was, "Why was this negative letter about the Catholic Church selected for publication?"  Next I thought, "Does the man realize that if we all felt about organized religion the way he does, the quiet and peaceful church he enjoyed each morning, and a myriad of other blessing, would not exist?"

 

In today first reading from Deuteronomy God tell Moses, “And today the LORD is making this agreement with you: you are to be a people peculiarly his own”  The Catechism of the Catholic Church states "One becomes a member of this people not by a physical birth, but by being "born anew," a birth "of water and the Spirit," that is, by faith in Christ, and Baptism."   Being a part of the people of God is better than just “me and God.”

 

March 1, 2007, Thursday of the First Week of Lent

 

From 1900 to 1960 Mary was the most popular name chosen for baby girls; in 1970 it dropped to 15; today it is 73.  In 1900 Esther, as in Esther Williams, was number 30; by 1970 it had dropped to 49; today it is 288.

 

Esther a beautiful Jewish woman was taken by King Ahasuerus of Persia as the queen against her will.  She went to great lengths to hide her physicality, as she did not want the king to be attracted to her. But the time came when she used her beauty to save her people. Taking risk with her life she requested a banquet with her, the king, and the man who wanted to kill all the Jews. There she was able to influence the king not to hang Mordecai her adopted father and instead to hang Haman the man who was plotting against the Jew.  Thus she saved the Jewish people in captivity.

 

Before she did this she prayed the pray we read in today’s first reading from the Book of Esther. God of Abraham, God of Isaac, and God of Jacob, blessed are you. Help me, who am alone and have no help but you, for I am taking my life in my hand. As a child I used to hear from the books of my forefathers that you, O LORD, always free those who are pleasing to you. Now help me, who am alone and have no one but you, O LORD, my God.”

 

Esther was a woman of deep faith, courage and patriotism, ultimately willing to risk her life for her adoptive Jewish people.  She was beautiful inside and outside.  Wouldn’t you be proud to have a daughter named Esther?  

 

February 26, 2007 Monday of the First Week of Lent

 

I think it was Plato who felt that the best way to decide what is moral or not is to ask the question, “Do I want to live in a world where everyone does this?”  For example, we should know that stealing is immoral because we don’t want to live in a world where everyone steals.  We should know that abortion is immoral because we would not still be alive if every mother in the world took the life of the unborn.  Who would want a world like that? The Golden Rule “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” and what God told Moses in today’s first reading, Love you neighbor as yourself.” follow this same reasoning.

 

                                                                         Not aborted baby

 

                                           

One night a man called a radio talk show and challenged the host who strongly believed that the government should facilitate the taking the life of the unborn.  The man shared that he was alive today because back when he was born the government still protected the unborn.  His mother did know who his father was. She was a prostitute and had become pregnant by one of her clients.  He went on to tell the sad story of how at fourteen and on his own he was forced into drugs and crimes.  He had spent several years either in jail or homeless.  In his late thirties he decided to change all that.  There was much he had to learn.  He did even know how to write a check.  He told the host he got help from whomever he could.  He even would call the host and ask for help.  He was very thankful to him and the others who were responsible for his getting on his feet.  Now, in his middle forties, he has his own home, a beautiful wife, and two lovely daughters.  He finished by saying that he would not be enjoying the wonderful gift of life if the law at the time had not protected him from being aborted by his mother.  The normally glib host began to stammer and could only respond with something like, “Yes, a, a, a, well a, a, life is always a, a, a, good.”

 

None of us would want to have been aborted by our mothers.  If we all followed the reasoning of Plato, the Golden Rule, or the law of love given to Moses by God, there would be no abortions. 

 

Sadly, today many Catholics do not understand this.  Only twenty-three percent of the U.S. population is Catholic yet over thirty-two percent of the abortions were preformed on Catholic mothers.  (Scroll down to my homily of December 21, 2006 if you are interested how this might have come about.) 

 

Obviously not all of our laws follow the reasoning of the great philosophers or the Golden Rule.  We cannot say, at least in the United States, that if it legal it is moral.  When we do something that is clearly against God’s commandments we cannot justify it by saying it was legal. And, pleading that what we did was legal most likely will not have much weight on Judgment Day. 

 

February 23, 2007, Friday after Ash Wednesday

 

One Lent I give up a lot of things.  I gave up drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes, reading newspapers, and watching TV.  I fasted completely from food all day on Wednesdays and until 10 pm on Fridays.  In addition, I made a Holy Hour and attended Mass everyday.  My cravings were somehow controlled by the Holy Spirit.   During the six weeks of Lent I found it fairly easy to do what before Lent would have been impossible.  The first three or four weeks I did experience some sort of low grade depression from the withdrawal, but it turned into joy the final two weeks.  That was thirty-two years ago.  Since then despite trying I have not come close to those kinds ambitious goals.

 

The experience taught me a few things: 

 

1. Contrary to what some may believe, it is positive and healing to give up things for Lent.  There are many things in our life, like say a glass of wine with dinner, that can become too important or an attachment.  Lent is a season of grace to help us experience more fully the freedom given to the baptized. 

 

2. If we are having difficulty keeping our Lenten resolutions it most likely means the Holy Spirit is not calling us this year to that particular form of denial.  The grace of the season may help us grow in holiness, but it is directed by the Holy Spirit not by us. 

 

3. Some of the things that we give up during Lent are meant not to return.  I have not smoked in years and continued to make a daily Holy Hour. 

 

4. We need to take Lent seriously.  Some of us may think that doing something special for Lent is a holdover from Sister Mary Christmas’ third grade class.  It is not.  It is a mature response to a loving invitation from Our Savior.

 

5. Change is slow but by responding to the promptings of the Holy Spirit during Lent we can become a new creation in six weeks. 

 

February 22, 2007, Feast of the Chair of St. Peter, Apostle

 

A good friend of mine in Philadelphia took me to a store filled with numerous and fantastic collector’s items. He knew the owner well and we were given a first class tour of the property. The owner, a very nice guy, saw that I was a priest as I had my clerics on.  When we were leaving, out of nowhere, he hit me with a strange statement, “You know Father that Pope Pius XII helped Hitler during the war.” I immediately shot back, “That is BS. Pius XII saved the lives of thousands of Jews during the war.” My reply may have been a bit aggressive, but I felt he had it coming as his comment was rude, out of character, and absolutely wrong.

 

My dad’s cousin, a Jesuit priest, spent 25 years at the Vatican studying all documents on Pius XII and the Holocaust. He said the facts are that the pope was the only real friend the Jews had during that time. I remember him asking, “Why are the Jews attacking the only friend they had?” It was totally confusing to him that a generation later the Jews would attack the pope, and in such a pronounced fashion.

 

Last month the mystery of all this was solved when a former high-ranking officer with the KGB claimed that the Kremlin and the Russian intelligence agency in the 1960s were set on executing a smear campaign against the Catholic Church, and the main target was Pope Pius XII.

                                                                                          

 

 

The KGB used the fact that Archbishop Pacelli had served as the papal nuncio in Munich and Berlin when the Nazis were beginning their bid for power against him. The KGB wanted to depict him as an anti-Semite who had encouraged Hitler’s Holocaust. To do this, they obtained some original Vatican documents to “slightly modify”.

A Romanian spy sent hundreds of archival documents connected in any way with Pope Pius XII to the KGB. None of the documents were incriminating in themselves, but they were sent to the KGB in any case. The KGB altered these documents and used them to produce a powerful play attacking Pope Pius XII, entitled The Deputy which eventually saw the stage in Germany in 1963.  It proposed that Pius XII had supported Hitler and encouraged him to go ahead with the Jewish Holocaust. The German director claimed to have 40 pages of documentation attached to the script that would support the thesis of the play.

The play ran in New York in 1964 and was translated into 20 languages. The play then led to a flurry of books and articles, some accusing and some defending the pontiff. Today, many people who have never heard of The Deputy are sincerely convinced that Pius XII was a cold and evil man who hated the Jews and helped Hitler do away with them.

 

One KBG agent said that people are more ready to believe smut than holiness.  (You don’t think so? Explain then the millions of people who believe every word in The Da Vinci Code despite the fact that hundreds of art expects, theologians, and historians have declared the entire book to be utterly, totally, and completely false.)

 

On this feast of the Chair of St. Peter let us pray for our present pope, Benedict XVI, that The Spirit of Truth will protect him and the Church from false and malicious attacks.

 

February 21. 2007, Ash Wednesday

 

                             

 

 

February 20, 2007. Tuesday the 7th Week in Ordinary Time

 

A good friend in New York was telling me recently that everyone she knows is suffering.  She has a very painful broken bone in her foot that is not healing.  Another friend has a nerve problem that causes sharp pains to constantly run through her head and neck. Another friend has cancer. Another has lost her job.  Another one her children’s family is braking up. The list of woes goes on and on.  All these people pray and are close to God. If God really loves them then why does He allowing them to suffer?

 

Some Christians answer this by saying that it is God’s will that there be no sickness or suffering.  What is standing in the way of healing is our lack of faith or a misunderstanding about suffering.  We should believe that God wanted us to be healed now.  They then point to churches where all sorts of extraordinary healings and blessing are taking place thanks to this kind of belief.

 

The other explanation is that God’s ways are not our ways.  Unbelievably He allowed His Son Jesus to suffer.  He allowed those who followed Jesus to suffer, St. Paul, St. Peter and the other apostles.  We should expect God not to spare those who are close to Him too.

 

What is the answer?

 

Today’s first reading from the Book of Sirach can give us a clue.   It speaks about trials, adversity, sorrows, and crushing misfortune.  It then goes on to explain: “For in fire gold and silver are tested, and worthy people in the crucible of humiliation.”

 

It seems that misfortunes, contrary to what reason may suggest or some Christians may believe, are a gift from God to test our worthiness.  St. Vincent de Paul said, “What was the life of Christ but a perpetual humiliation?”  How sad for the person who was healed due to a strongly held conviction, but at the cost of losing the gift of the crucible of humiliation that God had given her.   Maybe that is why St. Francis of Assisi on his death bed threw out of his room the Brother that prayed the his suffering be eased.  

 

“On a certain occasion when St. Francis was suffering extraordinary physical pain, one of his religious brothers, meaning to sympathize with him, said in his simplicity, “My father, pray to God that He treat you a little more gently, for His hand seems heavy upon you just now.” Hearing this, St. Francis strongly resented the unhappy remark of his well-meaning brother, saying, “My good brother, did I not know that what you have just said was spoken in all simplicity, without realizing the implication of your words, I should never see you again because of your rashness in passing judgment on the dispositions of Divine Providence.” Whereupon, weak and wasted as he was by his illness, St. Francis got out of bed, knelt down, kissed the floor and prayed thus, “Lord, I thank Thee for the sufferings Thou art sending me. Send me more, if it be Thy good pleasure. My pleasure is that You afflict me and spare me not, for the fulfillment of Thy holy will is the greatest consolation of my life.” St. Bonaventure

February 16, 2007 Friday the 6th Week in Ordinary Time

 

I came across an interesting article on the internet today.  It cites a very extensive study which proved, contrary to popular belief, that it can be dangerous to praise your children.  You can find it at “http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/AmericanFamily/story?id=2877896&page=1

 

G. K. Chesterton, wrote, If I had only one sermon to preach, it would be a sermon against pride. The more I see of existence and especially of modern practical an experimental [experiential] existence, the more I am convinced of the reality of the old religious thesis: that all evil began with some attempt at superiority.”

 

 In our first reading today from Genesis the people are filled with pride, and want to make a name for themselves, and to guarantee their own security.  This attitude is seen in the project of building that massive tower. This new sin of mankind is basically the same sort of sin committed by Adam and Eve.  Pride is excessive belief in one's own abilities, that interferes with the individual's recognition of the grace of God. It has been called the sin from which all others arise. It was the sin of the fallen angels.

 

                                                      

 

St. Teresa the Little Flower knew the surest way to attract God was by becoming small.   Jesus told St. Catherine of Siena, “I am He that is and you are she who is not.”  St. John the Baptist said about Jesus, “He must increase, but I must decrease.”(John 3:30)      

 

February 15, 2007 Thursday the 6th Week in Ordinary Time

 

There are many things that all religions are in agreement.  One is that it is good to live in the present moment.  The past is over and the future is yet to come.  What is real is the “right now’.  Christians take this a step further.  They believe it is good to always be aware of the presence of God.  Obviously these are both very difficult to do.  To remind us to come back into the present moment and into the presence of God, in Catholic countries church bells are rung every fifteen minutes.  Unfortunately, we do not live in a Catholic country.  Here if a church bell is rung more than once a day it is considered disturbing the peace and the police are called.  (For some strange reason no one calls the police when those extremely loud motorcycles come roaring by one after another and make the bombs of WWII seemed like a silent movie.)

 

Not living in a Catholic country, we need to find other things to help us come into God’s presence.  One might be to have a clock in our home that chimes every fifteen minutes, or to ware one of those wrist watches that beeps every hour.    

 

                                                         

 

In today’s first reading God tells Noah and his children that he has placed a rainbow in the sky as a sign of the covenant that He will never again destroy mankind with a flood.  We can use the rainbow too.  When we see one after the rains we can let it remind us to come into God’s presence, and that he will always love us, no matter.  Here in San Francisco we see a lot of rainbows.  Thanks to the gay community rainbow flags are hanging from many homes or are painted on buildings and places of business. Those who are active in Curculio use a lot of rainbows too.  Then there is Rainbow Ice Cream. Whenever you go to one of their shops let the rainbow cups bring you back to the present moment and God’s love.  We want to use whatever we can to help our minds and hearts stay in the presence of God every second of the day.

 

February 14, 2007, Valentine’s Day

 

                                                                     

 

The Church celebrated the feast of St. Valentine every February 14th until 1969 when the feast was removed from the Roman Catholic calendar, because there is not sufficient historical evidence that Valentine ever exited. This has not fazed lovers as they have gone on celebrating the February 14th as always.  Nor has it fazed the people of Dublin, Ireland who have his relics.  The Shrine with his relics is visited throughout the year by couples who come to pray to Valentine and to ask him to watch over them in their lives together. On February 14th the Reliquary is removed from beneath the side-altar and is placed before the high altar in the church and there venerated at the Masses.  Many couples in Dublin come to those Masses, which includes a Blessing of Rings for those about to be married.

 

Among the many legends surrounding St. Valentine two may explain the desire of lovers to remember him each year.  One is that on the evening before Valentine was to be martyred for being a Christian, he passed a love note to his jailer's daughter that read, "From your Valentine.” And the other is that during a ban on marriages of Roman soldiers by the Emperor Claudius II, St. Valentine secretly helped arrange marriages.

 

One very tragic event occurred on St. Valentine's Day in 1349.  Roughly 2,000 Jews were burned to death by Christian mobs in Strasbourg. These mobs were led by nobles who owed large sums to Jewish moneylenders (usury being a sin for Christians).  They blamed the Jews for poisoning the city's wells and causing the bubonic plague.  We need to ask our older brothers the Jews forgiveness for this and much, much more.

 

February 13, 2007, Tuesday the 6th Week in Ordinary Time

 

                                                            

 

There are at least ten different Babylonian versions of the story of the flood that constitute a very close parallel with the biblical story.  The Mesopotamian stories of the flood do not explain why the gods brought about such a disaster.   The biblical story does.  It conveys a deeply held religious conviction that evil is requited by a just God who is at the same time is a God of mercy.  The Bible has turned an amoral myth into a sort of parable of God’s judgment and grace in response to man’s evil-doing and sin.

 

There are two other important lessons to be gleaned form the story.  One is we can’t use the excuse, “Everyone does it.” Sometimes we think that wrong doings are not so bad because almost everyone else is doing it.  God must understand.  Well, the story of the flood in the Bible shows that this type of thinking reflects a misunderstanding of the nature of God, who said. “My ways are not you ways.”

 

The other is similar.  We can’t claim that it is impossible to live a fully God-like life in our culture.  It is indeed a challenge living in a culture such as ours.  We are bombarded daily from all different directions with messages that are inconsistent with the moral laws given to us by God though the Bible and the Church.  Noah teaches us that even when the whole society has deserted God’s way, we can be the exception and live a good life.

 

February 12, 2007, Monday the 6th Week in Ordinary Time

 

                                                                                

When I lived in Hawaii I loved attending a Mass said by Maryknoll priest who was very holy.  There is a prayer before Communion that according to the rubrics the priest is to say in an inaudible voice.  “Lord Jesus Christ. Son of the living God, by the will of the Father and the work of the Holy Sprit your death brought life into the world.  By you holy body and blood free from all of my sins, and from every evil. Keep me faithful to your teachings, and never let me be parted from you.”   This priest would pay no attention to the rubrics.  He said that prayer out loud so that everyone in the church could hear him.  When he got to “and never let me be parted from you.”, he slowed down and emphasized each word.  You just knew the last thing this priest wanted was to be separated from the God he loved so much. It was very moving hearing him pray deeply from his heart like that. 

 

Today’s first reading is about the sin of Cain.  His was different than the sin of Adam and Eve.  Cain’s sin of murder came from jealousy and hate.  His mother and father’s sin of disobedience came from a desire to acquire special or esoteric knowledge that would make them equal with God.  But the two sins had the same effect.  It separated them from God, as do all serious sins.  Just the thought of separation or parting from our creator should cause us the greatest fear.

 

                                                         

 

The saints understood this:

 

St. Ignatius of Loyola said: "I would not for the sake of all creation, or for the purpose of saving my life, consider committing a single venial sin."

 

 St. Catherine of Genoa wrote: When I had the vision in which I saw how much the shadow of the smallest act against God matters, I do not know why I did not die. I do not wonder that hell is so horrible, seeing that it is made for sin. But, horrible as it is... I think ... that even there God shows mercy, so terrible does even the shadow of a venial sin seem to me. 

 

St. Francis of Assisi said:  Had I committed but one little sin I would have ample reason to repent of it for the rest of my life.

 

St. Teresa of Avila put it: Follow the advice to please God until you find you have such a fixed determination not to offend the Lord that you would rather lose a thousand lives, and be persecuted by the whole world, than commit one venial sin.

 

February 10, 2007, Feast of St. Scholastica

 

Saint Scholastica was the abbess of a convent in Plumbariola and the twin sister of St. Benedict the founder of western monasticism.  A wonderful story about the two comes from St. Gregory the Great.  Once a year St. Benedict and two or three of the Brothers would leave the monastery and spend the day with St. Scholastica at her convent.  On this day she was particularly enjoying the visit when her brother reminded her that it was getting late and he and the other Brothers needed to leave for the monastery before dark.  Scholastica did not want them to go, so she prayed.  Suddenly it began to rain so hard that the Brothers had to stay.  They spent the night continuing to enjoy their conversation about prayer and holy things.  Three days later St. Benedict had a dream of his sister being escorted by angels to heaven.  Later that day Benedict was informed that his sister had died during the night.

 

                                                           St Scholastica from Lives of the Saints 

                                                

If St. Scholastica were alive today and in a situation similar to the one above, some might advise her not pray, but rather to visualize her brother not being able to leave.  Today for many visualizing what we want to happen has replaced prayer.

 

A man saw a picture in a magazine of a huge mansion in the Hollywood hills.  It was over 30,000 square feet with a couple of pools, a tennis court, a spectacular garden, and a view of the entire Los Angeles basin.  He wanted to own that house someday. So he cut the picture of the house out of the magazine and began to visualize himself and his family living in it.  Five years later his young daughter was going though a box of old papers when she began to scream out, “Daddy, daddy look I found a picture of our new house taken from plane.”  Until his daughter found the picture he had forgotten that five years previously he visualized his family living in the house.  

 

Stories like that have moved a lot of people to try visualization to get what they want.  Personally I think they are fools. Yes, it might get them a beautiful family, a great job, or the perfect house.  But what if these things are not ultimately what is best for them?  And more important, is it God’s will that they have them?   Maybe I am old fashion but when there is something we want I think it is much safer to simply pray that God’s will be done.  He loves us and desires nothing but our ultimate good. Besides, “What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world yet suffers the loss of his soul?”

 

February 9, 2007, Friday the 5th Week in Ordinary Time

 

While waiting to enter the seminary back in 1976 I worked in a parking lot near Fishermen’s Wharf in San Francisco.  One morning I found myself strongly temped to steal a single nickel from the cash register.  I mean I really wanted to have that nickel.   There is really no explanation as to why.  It was very little money and I certainly did not need it.   Fortunately with the temptation came a thought.  If I take the nickel then tomorrow I will want to steal a dime and the next day a quarter. Soon I will be a thief and eventually end up in jail.”  So I took the nickel – just kidding.  No, that stopped me.  But much better would have been if I did not take the nickel because I knew stealing was a sin and the wages of sin are death.

 

In today’s first reading our first parents, Adam and Eve are temped to eat of the fruit that God told them not to take.  The devil put in their minds that they will become like God if they eat the fruit.   So they disregarded God’s command and took the fruit.   And well, we all know what happened next.

 

The next time you get temped to sin, whether it is to miss Mass on Sunday, to engage in a form of illicit sex, to take something that does not belong to you, look at pornography on the internet, or whatever, don’t listen to all the rationalizations going on in your mind that for you it is OK.  Rather understand that it is wrong and that by giving into it you will change the path of your life for the worse.

 

Yesterday I learned of a very good man that just left his wife and children for another woman.   This has deeply hurt is wife, his children, his parents and his friends. Two or three years ago he most likely would have denied, like Peter, that he would ever hurt these people he loves so most.   I am sure it all started by giving into a strong temptation to a small venial sin with the woman.  After that, one thing led to another.  What is so sad is that two or three years from now when the love endorphins in his brain ware off, he most likely will not be as happy with the new woman as he was with his wife, and his family will be lost to him for good.  All sin is evil.  Never give into even the slightest temptation to sin. 

 

 

February 6, 2007, Tuesday the 5th Week in Ordinary Times

 

Which of the following is part of your belief system?

 

1. All is one. Everything and everyone is interrelated and interdependent. Ultimately there is no real difference between humans, animals, rocks, or even God. Any differences between these entities are merely apparent, not real.

 

2. All is god. All of creation partakes of the divine essence. All of life (and even non-life) has a spark of divinity within.

 

3. We are gods." Most of us our ignorant of our divinity, but we are gods in disguise. Our goal, therefore, should be to discover our own divinity.

 

4. We discover our own divinity by experiencing a change in consciousness. The human race suffers from a collective form of metaphysical amnesia. We have forgotten that our true identity is divine and thus must undergo a change of consciousness to achieve our true human potential.

 

5. We need to think in terms of gray, rather than black or white. Denying the law of non- contradiction, we sometimes believe that two conflicting statements can both be true. Therefore "all religions are true" and "there are many paths to God."

 

If you hold to any of the five you are a resident of the Bay Area - just kidding!  No, it means that you are not a Christian.  Today’s first reading from the book of Genesis is very clear. We are not gods.  God is God and we are His creatures.  We do not partake in the divine essence, but rather we are made in the image and likeness of God.  Pope John Paul II wrote in Dominum et Vivificantem, 34, “this means we have the capacity of having a personal relationship with God, as “I” and “you’ which will take place in God’s salvific communication with Man.

 

February 5, 2007, Monday of the 5th Week in Ordinary Times

 

Light, as you know, travels at a speed of 186,000 miles per second or 700 million miles per hour.  The nearest star is 4.6 light years away from our sun.  The diameter of our galaxy, the Milky Way, is about 100,000 light years and it has over 200 billion stars. The diameter of the universe is 156 billion light years and it has over 200 billion galaxies. The first day after the Big Bang the universe was only one light year across.  Therefore it has vastly expanded since its inception.  

 

                                           

 

Discoveries over the last forty years about the Big Bang and the formation of the universe, especially from radio telescopes, have most scientists agreeing that the odds of our universe existing the way it does are so incredibly small as to be virtually impossible,  Ninety percent of these men and woman are atheist.  They have had to formulate a new theory that would allow for chance.  So, most now believe that there are billions of other universes beyond ours.  A few don’t want to deal with chance or God, and they believe that there are an infinite number of universes, which would mean there are many universes out there just like ours.

 

Right now it is not possible for scientist to see beyond the other side of the outer shell of our universe or know anything of what may have existed before the Big Bang.  They can only guess, and from the above it is clear they do.  One thing we do know is 13.7 billion years ago there could not have been anything too close to us.  It there were then our universe could not have expanded from one light year across to 156 billion light years across.  Maybe the billions of universes that most scientist hope exist beyond ours are separate by trillions and trillions miles.  If so, then what is between them?  We know why our universe exist.  Why do the others exist?  If they are all expanding like ours, will they all eventually run over each other?  Gee, it seems so much easier to believe today’s first reading that tells us God created the world, than to believe there are multiple universes beyond ours.     

 

February 3, 2007, Feast of St. Blase,

 

Throats are being blessed today in most Catholic churches in the world.  This is old tradition that goes back many centuries. The blessing may be given by touching the throat of each person with two candles blessed on the feast of the Presentation of the Lord (February 2) and which have been joined together in the form of a cross. As the priest places the candles on the throat of each person, he says: Through the prayers of St. Blasé bishop and martyr, may God free you from ailments of the throat and from every other evil. In the name of the Father, and of the + Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

 

The blessing of throats is very popular.  When I was a pastor I would bless throats not only on February 3rd but also after the Masses on the following weekend.  I can’t remember seeing one person leave without having his or her throat blessed. 

 

                            

 

It is hard to say how much good it does.  It is a sacramental and so graces are received.  Once one of our parishioners got a sore throat after having his throat blessed by me.  He was not a regular at Sunday Mass.  Maybe it was God’s was of saying, “this is not magic we are practicing here.  What is the sense of having your throat blessed if you do not have enough faith to worship with the community on Sundays?”  Of course I shouldn’t be putting words in God’s mouth.  But it is strange that so many of us pass on attending Mass each Sunday, but we would not think of missing having our throats blessed.  One reason may be that sacramentals, especially the blessing of throats, communicate to us on a deeper level then our awareness something of God’s love.  And that can be very healing.

 

February 2, 2007, The Feast of the Presentation of the Lord

 

                                                          

 

I love the words that came from Simeon’s mouth when Mary and Joseph brought Jesus to the temple forty days after his birth and offered him to God.  Now, Master, you may let your servant go in peace, according to your word, for my eyes have seen your salvation, which you prepared in the sight of all the peoples: a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and glory for your people Israel.” It is part of the Liturgy of the Hours and is prayed in monasteries and convents all over the world by monks and nuns as they end their day. 

 

It was the Holy Spirit that gave Simeon the knowledge that the baby held by Mary was the savior of the world.  We often look in the wrong places for our salvation.  We may look to a particular person, a group, an ideology, an occupation, an investment, a philosophy, or ourselves.  But when we are filled with the Holy Spirit it becomes clear that there is only one source of salvation, Jesus Christ.  All those other things may be good to one degree or another.  They can help us in this life, but none of them can save us.  Jesus must be first in our lives.

 

February 1, 2007, Thursday of the 4th Week in Ordinary Time

 

My family comes from Andermatt in Switzerland.   It is a very small village.  The population I would guess is less than 2000.  Yet, it has a beautiful Baroque church that they say would cost over five million dollars to duplicate.  In countries such as Italy, Germany and Switzerland fabulous churches like the one in Andermatt are common.  Why did the people build these very expensive and beautiful churches? Well, there were various reasons.  One of them was a wish to reflect in the church building the majesty of God.  Just walking into such a building can touch the very depth of the unconscious self and in a unique way help to make life more meaningful. 

 

                                                 

 

Unfortunately most churches built in our country today are far from majestic. They, for the most part, are not much different than a secular hall.   Upon entering one you might not know if you were in a church or a movie theater.  Why this radical change in church architecture?  I think one reason is because we have become familiar with God in an unhealthy and unspiritual way.  This change is reflected in other ways too, from the congregation being dressed like they are going on a picnic to the ministers in some Churches being dressed like they had just come from a Hawaiian Laua.

 

                                                                         

 

In the opening verse of our first reading today from Hebrews we hear, “You have not approached that which could be touched and a blazing fire and gloomy darkness and storm and a trumpet blast and a voice speaking words such that those who heard begged that no message be further addressed to them. Indeed, so fearful was the spectacle that Moses said, “I am terrified and trembling.”  The passage reflects the sentiment of the Old Testament people towards God.  For them He was sheer majesty, absolutely unapproachable, and elicited sheer terror.  When the Son of God came into the world God suddenly was seen as approachable and His presence no longer elicited terror, but, and this is very important to understand, He remained sheer majesty.  It is important that God’s majesty be reflected our places of worship and how we dress when coming together to worship.  I once read that when we finally see God face to face we are going to be horrified at how causal we acted in His presence while we were on earth.  

 

January 30, 2007, Tuesday of the 4th Week in Ordinary Time

 

While greeting parishioners after Mass on Saturday evening, someone hit me with a difficult question, “If the consecrated wine is truly the body of Christ then how can one catch a virus by drinking it?”  I can’t remember how I answered but I do remember walking back to the sacristy not satisfied with my answer.  This is the answer I should have given.

 

The virus you acquire when receiving Holy Communion from the cup comes not from the Sacrament.  It is from the lips of those who have received before you.  The minister or priest wipes the virus off with a pacificator, but it is impossible to do so perfectly. Also, after the pacificator has been used ten to fifteen times the minister when wiping the chalice is simply wiping back on to the chalice the viruses it had just wiped off.

 

We are most contagious a few days before and a few days after the symptoms of a virus manifest themselves.  In light of this it is probably best during the winter never to partake from a shared cup.

 

January 29, 2007, Monday of the 4th Week in Ordinary Time

 

In today’s Gospel the demons know who Jesus is but they are afraid of him.  The people in the town have seen how powerful Jesus is but they want him to leave.  What is it that makes us reject what is best for us?  When the first organ transplant was performed at U.C.S.F. many years ago, the hospital staff was very excited until they discovered that the body had rejected the new organ.  Why did the body reject the very thing it needed to stay alive?

 

There are parts of us that are in sin or selfish or in need of healing love.  Those parts we tend to protect.  Some of us build a shell around it so no one can touch it. We even keep them from God.  Yet they are the parts of us that need the Fathers touch the most. On Friday I wrote about “the more”.   Overcoming the urge not to let God get too close is part of going for “the more”.  It is interesting, when we don’t feel like praying is when we may most need to pray.

 

January 26, 2007, Friday of the 3rd Week in Ordinary Time

 

Most of us when we were children, either at our house or perhaps at our grandparent’s, had a place on the kitchen wall where every few months our heights were measured.  With excitement we would look at the scale and see how much we had grown.  There was always a great feeling of satisfaction and pleasure knowing we were taller than before.  As adults it is no longer possible to grow in height.  In fact, if people my age were to periodically mark their heights on the kitchen wall they would fine themselves to be shrinking.   But, thank God, there are still many other ways that we can grow.  One of them is spiritually.  In that facet we can be like little children.  We can expect to grow and be excited when there is some indication that we have.  Sadly there are some that do not feel this way.  They are satisfied with simply being saved.  They have no urge to grow in grace, holiness and compassion.   They feel no need to deepen the life of God within them.   They have no understanding of what St. Ignatius called “the more”.  In today’s Gospel Jesus compares the Kingdom of God to a mustard seed that continues to grow until it becomes the largest of plants.  We pray that Holy Spirit place in our hearts a strong desire to grow, to always seek “the more”.

 

December 22, 2006, Friday of the 3rd Week of Advent

 

Today’s Gospel it taken from the Visitation of Mary to her cousin Elizabeth when Mary declares that all generations will call her blessed.  Tradition (Jerome’s History of the Birth of Mary) tells us that Mary’s parents, Joachim and Anna lived for twenty years without offspring and made a vow to the Lord that if He granted them a child, they would dedicate it to the service of God.  Joachim was alone in a field when an angel appeared with great brilliance to him.  The angel told him not to be afraid and said, “I am an angel of the Lord, sent to announce to you that your prayers have been heard and your alms have ascended in the sight of the Lord.  I have seen how you were put to sham, and heard the reproach of childishness wrongly put upon you.  God punishes not nature but sin, and therefore, when he closes a woman’s womb, he does this in order to open it miraculously later on, and to make it known that what is born is not the fruit of carnal desire but of the divine generosity. Did not the first mother of your race suffer the shame of childlessness until she was ninety years old, and yet bore Isaac, to whom was promised the blessing of all nations?  Was not Rachel barren for a long time and yet bore Joseph, who had power over all Egypt?  Who was stronger than Samson or holier than Samuel?  Yet they both had sterile mothers.  Believe these reasons and examples, which show that delayed conceptions and infertile childbearing are usually all the more wonderful!  So then, your wife will bear you a daughter and you will call her Mary.  As you have vowed, she will be consecrated to the Lord from infancy and filled with the Holy Spirit from her mother’s womb.  She will not live outside among the common people but will abide in the Temple at all times, lest any sinister suspicion be aroused about her.  And, as she will be born of an unfruitful mother, so, miraculously, the Son of the Most High will be born of her.  His name will be Jesus, and through him all notions will be saved. 

 

The day of the Mary’s birth was unknown. Then supposedly there was a holy man, diligent in the practice of contemplation, who, every year on the eight day of September, heard, as he prayed, the joyous choirs of angels chanting solemn hymns.  In prayer he asked why he heard this annually on this day and on no other.  The response from God was that on this day the glorious Virgin Mary had been born to the world, and that he should make this known to the all in the Church so that they might join the court of heaven in celebrating her birthday.  He passed this knowledge on to the pope and others, and they, fasting, praying and searching the Scriptures and ancient documents to ascertain the truth, decreed that this day should be celebrated throughout the world in honor of the holy Mary’s birth.

 

The Church solemnizes only three birthdays, namely, those of Christ, of holy Mary, and of John the Baptist.  These three birthdays mark three spiritual births, for we are reborn in water with John, in penance with Mary, and in glory with Christ.   

 

November 12, 2006, Sunday the 31st Week in Ordinary Time

 

Recently I heard of a very interesting study conducted in England on healing prayer.   It was done on patients that had already been discharged from the hospital.  Half of these patients received prayers six months after they had been discharged from the hospital and the other half received no prayers.  Then the medical records of both group’s hospital stay were compared.  The group that received the prayers six months after they were discharged had fewer complications while in the hospital than the group that received no prayers.  The study proved what many other studies have, that prayer is effective.  But it also proved that prayer is not limited by time.  Prayers, it seems, flower not in time but in eternity, and therefore are effective not just at the particular moment when they are said, but anywhere along the space-time continuum, past, present and future.   Prayers cannot change what has already happened, but what happens may be the result of prayers said sometime in the future.  

 

On Friday we had our first Mass for healing in well over a year, and even better, I prayed over each member of the congregation for the first time in over five years.  There were only about 45 people in attendance.  But it was something I did not think I would ever be able to do again.  Thank you so much for your prayers for me.  They are definitely being heard. 

 

We will have our second Mass on November 24th at seven thirty in the evening pacific standard time.   I am sure you can enjoy the fruits of the Mass even if you do not attend by praying with us at that time.  The best place to do that would be in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament.  I realize that your local church will be closed at that time, but maybe there is a 24 hr. Adoration chapel not far from you.  Many times on the road I would look for the local Catholic hospital to make my Holy Hour.  Hospital chapels are usually opened 24 hrs a day.

 

 

A young woman, Jeannette, whom I had been frequently praying with, died last August.  She had loved my healing ministry and wanted to work for me when we both got healed.  She had planned to take me to the Swiss consulate for a party and to help me get a Swiss passport.  She was certain up to a week before she died that she would be healed.

 

A few days before she died, with her family and friends we celebrated Mass in her bedroom.  Later I was able to speak to her alone.  I told her how sorry I was that she was going to die and that I had really been looking forward to her being part of the healing ministry.  She said, “Father I am still going to help you.  I love your ministry and will pray for it when I am in heaven.”                                   

 

                                                                                    

 

Today I stopped at China Beach for the first time in over forty years, even though I pass within a block of it every time I go to work.  Driving into the parking lot I noticed a big, beautiful mansion with a very large Swiss flag flying next to it.  My first reaction was, "So that is where the Swiss consulate is."  As I was leaving and wondering why I had not stopped at China Beach in so very many years and noticing the Swiss flag across the street, the thought came to me that it was Jeannette telling me that she is praying for me too. (See November 1st homily.) 

 

This morning a truck pulled up in front of me and blocked my way out of the gas station.  I put my hands up to indicate my displeasure.  While stuck there I noticed the name of his company on the back of the truck, “Serrano”. That was Mary Ann’s last name.  Was that a sign of prayers from heaven too?

 

As long as we are talking about signs, here is a very interesting one.  My psychiatrist told me this story today.  He and his wife spent a weekend at a B&B.   In the morning at 6:15 he was woken by a scratching sound on the bedroom door.  He opened the door to find a cat.  The cat ran in the room and jumped on the bed.  It sat next to him and his wife, purring, happy as can be, and after fifteen minutes wanted to be let out.  At breakfast his wife made a comment about the cat.  The couple that owned the B&B looked surprised and said "We don’t have a cat, in fact we have never seen a cat around here."  When my doctor got home on Sunday he learned that his cat had died the day before at 6:15 in the morning.

 

November 1, 2006 All Saints Day

 

Recently I received an email from a woman who has been making a Holy Hour daily for my full recovery.  She wanted me to know that every time she prays for me she sees two heavenly entities looking over me.  One she said is a short old lady who is very serious and very determined.  She is a real prayer warrior.  I immediately knew she was talking about a lady that for years, until she died about ten years, prayed for me and the healing ministry.  The other woman she said was younger with a beautiful, very peaceful spirit.  She was warning lipstick and was facing such that only the side of her face could be seen.  I immediately knew the other woman was my friend Mary Ann who used to help me at the Masses and was a very close spiritual friend.  The email stated that the two women are continually praying to God for my complete recovery.

 

Recently I transferred some old VHS tapes to DVD.  One was a TV program that both Mary Ann and I were on before we got sick about five years ago.  I sent the DVD to the woman who is praying for me with the hope that she might recognize Mary Ann as one of the entities in heaven praying for me.  Two days ago she wrote this, I honestly was dying to ask you if the lady was Mary Ann that I saw because the second I saw her smile, I knew in my heart that it was her!  She is extremely peaceful in heaven and watching over you.  Interestingly enough, after I shared with you about their spirits being with me during Eucharistic Adoration, visions of their faces have ceased.”  It seems that the Lord really wanted me to know that I had two friends in heaven praying for me.  

 

There, I am sure, are many in heaven praying for you too.  Today we celebrate the feast of All Saints, not just the canonized saints, but all the beautiful souls that are enjoying for all eternity the Beatific Vision in heaven.  Today we honor those loves one who do not need our prayers, but are praying for us.

 

 

October 13, 2006 Friday the 27th. Week in Ordinary Time

 

In today first reading St. Paul writes,And that no one is justified before God by the law is clear, for the one who is righteous by faith will live.”  Paul is clearly telling us that we cannot earn our way into heaven.  When we stand before the Pearly Gates each of us is going to fall short.  Our only hope for salvation is Jesus Christ.   Only in, by, and though the merits of Jesus Christ we will be found worthy to enter for all eternity into the Holy of Holies.

 

                                                                             

 

This faith in Christ is both expressed and increased in worship.  When the Church comes together on Sunday to thank God for sending his Son into the world salvation is made present. This is why it is so disturbing when we hear that today only six per cent of Christians in England attend church on Sundays. Where is their faith, and more important, where will they find salvation?

 

October 12, 2006 Thursday the 27th. Week in Ordinary Time

 

In the first reading today Paul reminds the Galatians that it is the Spirit who is responsible for their mighty works.  He does not tell us what these works were, but from other New Testament reading we can assume they involved healings and miracles.  In the Gospel Jesus tells us that what we ask for we will receive and says, “If you then, who are wicked, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will the Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him?”  So, both readings point to the Holy Spirit.

 

Yesterday Cardinal Kasper, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, said it is crucial to be engaged with the diverse global Pentecostal movement, which numbers 600 million members. He said that we can learn from Pentecostals.  He was speaking at Duquesne University which first opened its doors as the Pittsburgh Catholic College of the Holy Ghost in October 1878, and where the Catholic Charismatic movement began in 1969.  

 

The Second Vatican Council stated in the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church, Lumen Gentium, “It is not only through the sacraments and the ministration of the Church that the Holy Spirit makes holy the people, leads them and enriches them with virtues…He also distributes special graces among the faithful of every rank. By these gifts he makes them fit and ready to undertake various tasks and offices for the renewal and building up of the Church.

 

Bert Ghezzi in his fine book Mystics and Miracles, writes, I have noticed an intriguing thread running through the lives of several mystics we have observed.  God touched them in extraordinary ways when they prayed the “Veni Creator Spiritus,” the ancient hymn to the Holy Spirit.

     The hymn is attributed to Rabanus Maurus, a saintly scholar, abbot, and archbishop who lived in ninth-century Germany.  The prayer came to be used in the liturgy for Pentecost, and religious communities all over Europe adopted the practice of reciting it.

     The “Veni Creator Spirit” marked the moment when Clare of Assisi made her radical commitment to Christ. St. Francis and his brothers met the lovely runaway at the door of St. Mary of the Angels. As they escorted her to the altar, where she would embrace the gospel, they chanted the beautiful hymn to the Holy Spirit.

     If we can believe St. Teresa of Avila’s harsh self-evaluation, her early years as a num were bogged sown in mediocrity.  She says her spiritual life only began to flourish when a spiritual director required her to pray daily the “Veni Creator Spiritus.”  Shortly after Teresa began to pray it, she experienced her first ecstasy.  It was as if the hymn opened her spiritual ears to a divine voice within, which seemed to say, “I will not have you hold conversations with men but with angels.”

     The “Veni Creator Spiritus” also occasioned a deepening of St. Lutgarde mysticism.  Biographer Thomas of Cantimpre reported that one Pentecost, when the hymn was chanted, observers saw Lutgarde mysteriously transported in prayer.  They said she appeared to float off the floor.  Thomas commented that the saint’s body momentarily seemed to share in the supernatural privileges of her spirit, which was elevated heavenward.

     Scripture assigns the Holy Spirit the titles of Advocate, Counselor, Helper, Intercessor, and Teacher.  He is the One the Father sends to intervene in human lives. He is often depicted as dove descending gently to us.  A line in the “Veni Creator Spiritus” calls him the ‘finger of God’s right hand’  Thus, for centuries the church has seen the Spirit as the touch of God in our lives.”

 

Here is the full test of the “Veni Creator Spiritus  http://www.catholic-forum.com/Saints/pray0638.htm

 

 

September 11, 2006 Monday the 23rd Week in Ordinary Time

 

In today’s Gospel Jesus ask the question, “…is it lawful to do good on the Sabbath rather than to do evil, to save life rather than to destroy it?”  When he said Sabbath, did he mean Saturday or Sunday?  He meant Saturday.  I remember being in Israel on the Sabbath.  Everything, and I mean everything, was closed from sundown on Friday until sundown on Saturday.

 

If Jesus understood the Sabbath to be Saturday, how did Christians come to celebrate it on Sunday?  Well, at first they had two special days.  One was Saturday, the Sabbath, when they remembered creation and the other was Sunday, the Lord’s Day, when they remember redemption. Gregory of Nyssa said the two days were siblings.  After awhile it was felt that there was no compelling reason for dividing the spiritual content shared by the siblings between two days.  The days were put into one single day.   Thus Christians dropped the Sabbath on Saturday and included it in the Day of the Lord, Sunday.  “the day of Jesus Chris must then necessarily take precedence.”

 

September 8, 2006, – Feast of the Birth of the Blessed Virgin Mary

St. Bernard Clairvaux, a Cistercian monk, was the founder of many monasteries.   Before his death in 1150, the Benedictine Order, to whom he belonged, had spread to one hundred and sixty monasteries across Europe.   A Doctor of the Church, he is sometimes considered the Devotional Doctor.  He had great devotion to Jesus Christ crucified and His mother, Mary. This spiritual gift helped him bear all of his mistakes, failures and disappointments with charity and confidence. On this feast of the birth of the mother of Our Lord let’s look at one of his writings about Mary.

Rejoice, Adam, our father, and above all you, Eve, our mother. You were parents to all of us and at the same time our murderers. You who doomed us to death even before we were born, be comforted now. One of your daughters – and what a daughter! – will comfort you… So come, Eve, run to Mary. May the mother run to the daughter. The daughter will answer for her mother and will wipe away her fault… For the human race will now be raised up by a woman.

What did Adam say in times past? “The woman whom you put here with me – she gave me fruit from the tree, and so I ate it.” (Gen 3:12) Those were nasty words, which increased his fault rather than wiping it away. But divine Wisdom triumphed over so much malice. After vainly trying to give birth to the opportunity to forgive by questioning Adam, God now finds that opportunity in the treasure of his inexhaustible goodness. He gives the first woman a substitute, a wise woman in the place of the one who was foolish, a woman who is as humble as the other was proud.

Instead of the fruit of the tree of death, she offers to humankind the bread of life. She replaces this bitter and poisonous nourishment with the sweetness of an eternal food. So Adam, change your unjust accusation to an expression of gratitude and say: “Lord, this woman whom you gave me offered me the fruit of the tree of life. I ate of it; its flavor was sweeter than honey from the comb (Ps 19:11), because by means of this fruit, you gave me back life.” So that is why the angel was sent to a virgin. Oh admirable Virgin, worthy of all honors! Woman whom we must venerate infinitely among all women, you repair the fault of our first parents, you give life back to all their descendants.

St. Bernard wrote the famous prayer to the Blessed Virgin Mary know as The Memorare.

REMEMBER, O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known that anyone who fled to thy protection, implored thy help, or sought thy intercession was left unaided. Inspired with this confidence, I fly to thee, O Virgin of virgins, my Mother; to thee do I come; before thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful. O Mother of the Word Incarnate, despise not my petitions, but in thy mercy hear and answer me. Amen.

August 26, 2006 Saturday the 20th Week in Ordinary Time

 

A disturbing article appeared in today’s San Francisco Chronicle concerning a possible indictment of criminal charges against the bishop of Santa Rosa. On April 28, a priest admitted to Bishop Daniel Walsh and other church officials that he had offered a boy $100 to strip dance in front of him and that he had also kissed two boys on the lips -- comments that later led to far more serious allegations.  Three days later, on May 1, a diocesan attorney faxed a written report of the incident to the county's Child Protective Services.  State law requires clergymen, among others, to immediately report by telephone any suspicions of child sex.  The delay in reporting allowed the priest to flee to Mexico.   From reading the letters to the editor in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, it is clear the people in the diocese are far more upset with their bishop than with the guilty priest.

 

The extremely high level of anger at the hierarchy for the totally incompetent and even outrageous way it has handled the priest-child molestation crises has greatly hurt the Church.  There has been a drop in contributions, Mass attendance and, maybe worse of all, in acceptance of the teaching authority of Church.  Sadly, in Ireland, where there have been even more scandals involving the clergy, Mass attendance has fallen off almost completely.

 

This type of unfortunate response to scandals by the clergy, although quite understandable, does not come from the Holy Spirit. In today’s Gospel Jesus’ tells us exactly how we ought to respond to religious leaders who failed miserably, Therefore, do and observe all things whatsoever they tell you, but do not follow their example.

                  

The Protestant Reformation is perhaps the best example of why Jesus would command something so counter intuitive.  The recent mistakes made by the hierarchy are nothing compared to the corruption of the popes, bishops and priests during the sixteenth century.  Ulrich Zwingli, Martin Luther, John Calvin and Ignatius of Loyola each clearly saw this. Zwingli, Calvin and Luther left the Catholic Church.  But, Ignatius traveled to Rome and pledged his obedience to the pope. Zwingli, Calvin and Luther’s course has resulted to date in the establishment of over 35,000 denominations and independent Churches in the Christian world, thus substantially weakening the Church.  Ignatius’s course has resulted in millions and millions of Christian men and woman being properly formed in Christ by prayer, the sacraments and the Gospel, thus substantially strengthening the Church. 

 

When we are angered and confused by the scandals of our clergy, let us pray though these difficult words of Our Lord, Therefore, do and observe all things whatsoever they tell you, but do not follow their example.  For bishops and priests are human and will always disappoint us. And, Our Dear Lord’s final prayer was that we may be one as He and the Father are one.

 

August 22, 2006 Memorial of the Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary

 

This is from http://campus.udayton.edu/mary//questions/yq/yq73.html

 

Q: Why do we call Mary Queen?

A: Assumption and Coronation must be sharply distinguished. Whereas the assumption has been the object of dogmatic definition (1950), the coronation of Mary has never been more than a pious advocation (rosary), an iconographical motif (since the 12th century) and a devotional custom (coronation of Mary statues known already in the early middle ages). However, the coronation points to a Marian title known in Christian tradition since from the beginning of the 4th century. Meant is the title of Queen. This title was given to Mary as an indication of her preeminence or excellence based primarily on her role as Mother of Jesus Christ, Theotokos and Panagia (all holy one). The title found its way into the liturgy of the hours (Hail Holy Queen...) and popular piety (Litany of Loreto). Over time the attribution of this title to Mary became generally accepted so that Pius XII in 1954 instituted the liturgical feast of the Queenship of Mary. At the same time, the pope issued a major document about the queenship of Mary, the Encyclical Ad Caeli Reginam (Oct. 11, 1954).

Testimonies of the Church fathers on this title are almost innumerable, but there exists also a biblical foundation for it: Lk 1:32/33 making reference of Christ's everlasting reign, and Elisabeth's greeting to Mary as the "Mother of my Lord." These texts show that because of the Son's royal dignity, Mary possessed a greatness and excellence that set her apart. This is what we call her Queenship. Pius XII was well aware that this title should not be used in the manner of modern political life.

Mary's Queenship is one of love and service, not pomp and power, as is said about her son (Jn 18,36; Mt 20,20). It is thus pointed out that the roots of Mary's Queenship are to be found in the Paschal Mystery of Christ, which is a mystery of self-giving, death, and resurrection-ascension, the reaching of glory through humility (abasement-exaltation). Along these lines of theological reflection we see four reasons why Mary deserves to be Queen:

1) She is Queen because she is the Mother of the Lord, also called the Messianic King (see: Col 1,16; Lk 1,32; Lk 1,43).

2) She is Queen because she is wholeheartedly associated with her Son's salvific work (Rv 12,5).

3) She is Queen because she is the perfect disciple of Christ (Rv 2,10; 3,21).

4) She is the most excellent member of the Church, because of her mission and holiness.

All of these reasons show that Mary's Queenship can only be understood as a gift of her son to participate in his excellence of love. They also show that it is within the kingly status of the People of God that Mary-Queen fulfills her true vocation.

For biblical foundation of the dogma of the Assumption, see:

·  What is the origin and meaning of the liturgical celebration of Mary as Queen?

 

·  Coronation of Mary

August 18, 2006 – Friday the 19th Week in Ordinary Time

 

In today’s Gospel Jesus says, "Have you not read that from the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female' and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh'? So they are no longer two, but one flesh.”

Dr. Tom Ellis, chairman of the Southern Baptist Convention's Council on the Family said that for "...born-again Christian couples who marry...in the church after having received premarital counseling...and attend church regularly and pray daily together..." experience only 1 divorce out of nearly 39,000 marriages -- or 0.00256 percent

A recent study by the Barna Research Group throws extreme doubt on these estimates. Barna released the results of their poll about divorce in 1999.  They had interviewed 3,854 adults from the 48 contiguous states. The margin of error is within 2 percentage points. The survey found divorce rates among conservative Christians were significantly higher than for other faith groups, and for atheists and agnostics.

George Barna, president and founder of Barna Research Group, commented: "While it may be alarming to discover that born again Christians are more likely than others to experience a divorce, that pattern has been in place for quite some time.”

Barna Project Director Meg Flammang said: "We would love to be able to report that Christians are living very distinct lives and impacting the community, but ... in the area of divorce rates they continue to be the same.

 Group                                                     Percent Divorced

Non-denominational Christians                                     34%

Baptists                                                                        29%

General Population                                                       25%

Mainline Protestants                                                     25%

Mormons                                                                      25%

Catholics                                                                      21%

Lutherans                                                                     21%

The state with the lowest divorce rate in the nation is Massachusetts. At last count it had a divorce rate of 2.4 per 1,000 population, compared to President Bush’s state of Texas which was 4.1.

 

In a talk to the Synod on Family Life in 1980, Pope John Paul II said, “Before his death, on the very threshold of the paschal mystery, Christ prayed, saying: ‘Father most holy, protect them with your name which you have given me, that they may be one, even as we are one.” (Jn 17:11) In so doing, he also asked, maybe in a very special way, for the unity of spouses and of families. He prayed for the unity of his disciples, for the unity of the Church. And Saint Paul compared the mystery of the Church with marriage (Eph 5:32). Thus, the Church not only gives the family a part in her care, but in a certain sense, she also considers the family to be her model. In the love of Christ, her Spouse, who loved us even unto death, the Church contemplates husbands and wives who have promised to love one another throughout their lives until death. And she considers it to be her singular obligation to protect that love.

Marriage is a sacrament. Those who were baptized in the name of the Lord are also married in his name. Their love is a participation in God’s love. He is its source. The marriage of Christian couples is like the image here on earth of the marvel of God’s life, a life, which is the loving and fruitful communion of the three persons in one single God, and of God’s covenant with the Church in Christ. Christian marriage is a sacrament of salvation; for each member of the family, it is the path to sanctity
.”

For an excellent analysis of divorce in the Catholic Church go to: http://www.godspy.com/life/Breaking-Vows-When-Faithful-Catholics-Divorce-Tom-Hoopes.cfm

Father Patrick Paton the founder of the Family Rosary Crusades believed deeply that the answer to divorce was prayer, “The family that prays together stays together.” He preached this to millions of people for fifty years.  In the 1960s his world wide ministry began to fade.  Since then the divorce rate in the United States has doubled.

 

August 17, 2006 – Thursday the 19th Week in Ordinary Time

 

Several years ago a friend of mine suffered a severe stroke.  He lost almost half of his brain and was not able to walk or speak.  After two or three years of therapy he regained completely his ability to walk and most of his ability to speak.  But emotionally he still was not healed.  He was a very angry person and had a difficult time trusting in people.  Most of all he harbored in his heart hate for those whom he felt were responsible for his stroke and long recovery.  This was two of his former supervisors who hand put a great deal of pressure on him at work, and some of the nurses at the rehabilitation hospital where he did not get good care.  From time to time he would say to me, “I will never forgive them.  They will burn in hell for all eternity for what they have done to me.”

 

Recently someone, by the grace of God, was able to convey to my friend that his stroke was a gift from God.  Now all his anger is gone.  He seems like a new person, happy and full of life.

 

In today’s Gospel we are given a very strong message to forgive.  This is often difficult or impossible.  Perhaps if we see everything that happen in our lives as ultimately being a gift from God we will find ourselves not needing to forgive, but only being grateful.  ..give thanks in all circumstances, for this is God's will for you in Christ Jesus.” 1Th 5:18  

                                                                                              

August 14, 2006 - Memorial of Saint Maximillian Kolbe, priest and martyr

 

Is it very sad but before we can write about St. Maximillan, false accusations made over the last twenty-five years that Kolbe was anti-Semitic must first be addressed. Sigmund Gorson knew Father Kolbe well in Auschwitz where he was imprisoned for his Jewish faith. In a recent letter to American Jewish leaders, the major broadcasting network and several Jewish organizations, Gorson wrote "To utter or to even think for one second that Kolbe was anti-Semitic and a known Jew-hater is absolutely ludicrous. . . . Kolbe was never. . . anti-anyone. If there would be more like him, no Jew would be harmed, no Jew would suffer and no Jew would be killed. He loved the Jewish people, he suffered with them, he cried when they cried and smiled with them.... I know, because I lived with him In Auschwitz-Hell.... He was a shining and indeed a brilliant example of decency and bravery, a great credit to my beloved homeland, Poland, and to his Catholic Faith."  For more about this go to http://www.consecration.com/antisemit

 

On 16 October 1917, with six companions, Kolbe founded the Crusade of Mary Immaculate, with the aim of "converting sinners, heretics and schismatics, particularly freemasons, and bringing all men to love Mary Immaculate". In January 1922, he began to publish a monthly review, the Knight of the Immaculate, in Krakow. .Father Kolbe, as a journalist, publisher and intellectual who had refused German citizenship, was considered a threat to absolute German domination. To incriminate him, the Gestapo permitted one final printing of the "Knight of Mary Immaculate" in December of 1940. It was in this issue that Father Maximilian wrote words of wisdom for today “The real conflict is inner conflict. Beyond armies of occupation and the catacombs of concentration camps, there are two irreconcilable enemies in the depth of every soul: good and evil, sin and love. And what use are victories on the battle-field if we ourselves are defeated in our innermost personal selves?”

 

In Auschwitz in 1941 ten prisoners were designated to be executed as revenge fro trying to escape.  Kolbe pointed to Francis Gajowiniczek and said, “I am a polish Catholic priest.  I am old. I want to take his place because he has a wife and children.” Kolbe and the other nine were thrown into the starvation block.  For two weeks he encouraged the others, leading them in songs and prayers.  By the third week all were dead except Kolbe and four others.  His guards could scarcely bear the saint's composure, and they speeded his end by injecting him with phenol. He died on August 14, the eve of the Assumption.  Father Kolbe had prayer to die on a feast of Mary and his prayers were answered.

 

Although Maximilian Kolbe had been a brilliant scientist, mathematician, and religious journalist, he is remembered for this last act of charity. Kolbe was epitomized the Polish religious and the many unsung heroes of the concentration camps. Pope John Paul II, previously archbishop of Cracow, canonized Father Kolbe in the presence of the sergeant whose life had been saved.

 

Finally, this is taken from Pope Paul VI Discourse at Maximilian Kolbe's Beatification: “Maximilian Kolbe was an apostle of the formal veneration of Mary seen in all her pristine splendor, in the original and privileged character of the definition she gave of herself at Lourdes: the Immaculate Conception. It is impossible to separate the name of Father Kolbe, his activity or his mission, from the name of Mary Immaculate. He founded the Militia Immaculate here in Rome before he was even a priest, on October 16, 1917;... We all know how this humble, meek Franciscan, with incredible courage and extraordinary talent for organization, developed this initiative of his, and made of the devotion to the Mother of Christ, the Woman clothed with the sun, the center of his spirituality, his apostolate, and his theology. Let us not be reluctant to admire him, to adopt the watchword which the new blessed leaves us as his legacy, as though we feared that such zeal to honor Mary might clash with the other two theological and spiritual currents so prominent in today's religious thought and life: No competition here! In Father Kolbe's mind, Christ occupies not merely the first place, but strictly speaking, the only place necessary and sufficient for salvation. Nor is love for the Church and for her mission absent from the teaching or the apostolic endeavors of our new Blessed. For it is precisely from the way Mary completes and serves the universal plan of Christ for the salvation of all men that she draws all her prerogatives and all her greatness."

 

August 11, 2006 - Memorial of Saint Clare, virgin

 

St. Clare would compare herself to Jesus as though looking in a mirror. She tried to conform her behavior to his image, and she taught others to do the same.  This is part of what she wrote to Queen Agnes of Bohemia. “Look into that mirror daily, O queen and spouse of Jesus Christ.  Always study your face in it, so that within and without you may adorn and clothe and gird yourself with all manner of virtue.  So by God’s grace you can contemplate blessed poverty, holy humility and sacred charity, which are reflected in that mirror.”

 

Many of us today are impressed by people or groups that report healings, care for the poor or drawing large numbers to Christ. These are all wonderful, but Clare was impressed by poverty. After hearing St. Francis of Assisi preach she was determined to imitate Christ’s poverty.   Clare wrote. “O blessed poverty” To those who love and embrace her she gives eternal riches.  To those who process and desire her, God promises the kingdom of heaven and bestows eternal glory and the blessed life.  O poverty whom the Lord Jesus Christ deigned to embrace so completely!”

 

St. Clare and her sisters wore no shoes, ate no meat, lived in a poor house, and kept silent most of the time. Yet they were very happy, because Our Lord was close to them all the time. She was humble, merciful, charming, optimistic, and chivalrous. She would get up late at night to tuck in her sisters who'd kicked off their covers. Daily she meditated on the Passion.

 

August 10, 2006 – Thursday the 19th Week of Ordinary Time

 

A young man in his late twenties or early thirties called me to his bed while I was visiting one of our parishioners in the hospital.  He was very good looking and sitting at the edge of his bed was an equally good looking young woman.  He had a question for me.  “Father I have acquired everything in my life that I thought I needed to be happy.  Please tell me why I am not only not happy, but why do I have this empty feeling inside?”  I said, “You know what you need.”  He said, “No, Father I do not.”  I said, “Yes you do, just say it.”  He said, “Jesus?”  I said “Yes Jesus and you need to go back to church.”  He said, “Father I know you are right, but I cannot because for too long I have told too many people that the Catholic Church has nothing to offer.”  I gave him my card and asked him to call me if he needed to talk more.  He never called me.

 

In today’s Gospel Jesus says,Whoever loves his life loses it, and whoever hates his life in this world will preserve it for eternal life.”

 

August 9, 2006 – Wednesday the 18th Week of Ordinary Time

 

Sixty-one years ago today we dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki Japan. Below is part of the address the funeral for the victims.  It is a wonderful lesson in the truth that the hand of God is everywhere.

 

On August 9, 1945, at 10:30 A.M. a meeting of the Supreme Council of War was held at the Imperial Headquarters to decide whether Japan should capitulate or continue to wage war. At that moment the world was at a crossroads. A deci­sion was being made that would either bring about a new and lasting peace or throw the human family into further cruel bloodshed and carnage. And just at that same time, at two minutes past eleven in the morning, an atomic bomb exploded over our district of Urakami in Nagasaki. In an instant, eight thousand Chris­tians were called into the hands of God, while in a few hours the fierce flames reduced to ashes this sacred territory of the East. At midnight of that same night the cathedral suddenly burst into flames and was burned to the ground. And exactly at that time in the Imperial Palace, His Majesty the Emperor made known his sacred decision to bring the war to an end.


 

On August 15, the Imperial Prescript which put an end to the fighting was formally promulgated, and the whole world welcomed a day of peace. This day was also the great feast of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary. It is significant to reflect that Urakami Cathedral was dedicated to her. And we must ask if this convergence of events-the ending of the war and the celebration of her feast-was merely coincidental or if there was here some mysterious providence of God.

 

I have heard that the second atomic bomb, calculated to deal a deadly blow to the war potential of Japan, was originally destined for another city. But since the sky over that city was covered with clouds, the American pilots found it impossible to aim at their target. Consequently, they suddenly changed their plans and decided to drop the bomb on Nagasaki, the secondary target. However, yet another hitch occurred. As the bomb fell, cloud and wind carried it slightly north of the munitions factories over which it was supposed to explode and it exploded above the cathedral.

 

This is what I have heard. If it is true, the American pilots did not aim at Urakami. It was the providence of God that carried the bomb to that destination.

 

Is there not a profound relationship between the destruc­tion of Nagasaki and the end of the war? Nagasaki, the only holy place in all Japan-was it not chosen as a victim, a pure lamb, to be slaughtered and burned on the altar of sacrifice to expiate the sins committed by humanity in the Second World War?

 

The human family has inherited the sin of Adam who ate the fruit of the forbidden tree; we have inherited the sin of Cain who killed his younger brother; we have forgotten that we are children of God; we have believed in idols; we have disobeyed the law of love. Joyfully we have hated one another; joyfully we have killed one another. And now at last we have brought this great and evil war to an end. But in order to restore peace to the world it was not sufficient to repent. We had to obtain God's pardon through the offering of a great sacrifice

 


Before this moment there were many opportunities to end the war. Not a few cities were totally destroyed. But these were not suitable sacrifices; nor did God accept them. Only when Nagasaki was destroyed did God accept the sacrifice. Hear­ing the cry of the human family, He inspired the emperor to issue the sacred decree by which the war was brought to an end.

 

Our church of Nagasaki kept the faith during four hundred years of persecution when religion was proscribed and the blood of martyrs flowed freely. During the war this same church never ceased to pray day and night for a lasting peace. Was it not, then, the one unblemished lamb that had to be offered on the altar of God? Thanks to the sacrifice of this lamb many millions who would otherwise have fallen victim to the ravages of war have been saved.

 

How noble, how splendid was that holocaust of August 9, when flames soared up from the cathedral, dispelling the darkness of war and bringing the light of peace! In the very depth of our grief we reverently saw here something beautiful, something pure, something sublime. Eight thousand people, together with their priests, burning with pure smoke, entered into eternal life. All without exception were good people whom we deeply mourn.

 

 .


August 5, 2006 – Saturday the 17th. Week in Ordinary Time

 

A radio personality talked to teenagers at various High Schools throughout the country for over twenty years.  He would ask them the question, “If a stranger fell into the river and your dog fell in at the same time and you could only save one, which one would you save?”  Consistently in each school about half the children said they would save the stranger and half their dog.  He then would ask the group that would save the stranger if their classmates who answered that they would save the dog were wrong.  Consistently they would answer, “No, they are not wrong, it is just their opinion.”

 

Today’s readings are about two prophets.  One they wanted to kill, Jeremiah, and the other they did kill, John the Baptist.  Today we don’t kill our prophets; we dismiss them by saying that their warnings are just their opinion.  Unfortunately this dismissal may lead to our doom.

 

After the hot summer here and in Europe few of us doubt that the planet is getting warmer.  The question in the scientific community is why.  Some say it is due to carbon emissions, others say it is because the sun is getting hotter and others because of a large number of volcanoes on the surface of the world oceans.   But perhaps there is another explanation, sin.

 

A full one third of those conceived in the last thirty years were killed by their mothers before they were delivered.  Is it possible that these and our many other grave sins are the cause of the increased world wide weather chaos?   Unfortunately, if global warming were the effects of sin in the world and Our Dear Lord were to send us a prophet to warn us, we probably would brush him or her off by saying, “It is just her opinion.”

 

August 3, 2006 – Thursday the 17th. Week in Ordinary Time

 

Once a woman told me that she did not go to church because she knew her neighbor to be a sinner and yet every Sunday he ushered at mass.  It seems she, like many of us, have a misunderstanding that only saints should be part of the church.  Today’s gospel let us know this is not true.  The separation of the good from the bad will happen at the end of the ages, not at the front door of our churches or even the Communion line.

 

Why?  St. Teresa of Avila said, “I hold that love, where present, cannot possibly be content with remaining always the same.”  Until the end the ages there is always hope that the bad may become good. What better place for this to happen than the church.  So, if you are a sinner like me, know you are most welcomed at Mass on Sunday.

 

August 1, 2006 - Memorial of St. Alphonus Liguori 

 

St. Alphonsus was the founder of the Redemptorists Fathers.  His order is very small in the Bay Area, but is very large in other parts of the county.  A Redemptorist’s priest friend of mine was ordained in 1965 with ten other men from his home parish in Brooklyn New York

 

I believe St. Alphonsus' greatest teaching was on the love of God.  Alphonsus said that if we were to take all the love of all the people that had ever lived on the face of the earth, and all those still to come and put that love together with all the love of all the angels in heaven, it would only be like a drop of water in a vast ocean, compared to the love of God.  And if this love were fully revealed to us we would die on the spot.  But we can have glimpses of His love.  One of the best ways to get a glimpse is by meditating on a crucifix. He said that the person who does not acquire the love of God will scarcely persevere in the grace of God, for it is very difficult to renounce sin merely through fear of chastisement.

 

It would be well worth reading his book, The Redeeming Love of Christ. A copy can be purchased from Amazon.com for less than two dollars. Here is one of many wonderful quotes from the book, "When we hear people talk of riches, honors and amusements of the world, let us remember that all things have an end, and let us then say: "My God, I wish for You alone and nothing more."

July 25, 2006 – Feast of St. James, Apostle

 

There are many stories about St. James.   In one, he brought back to life a boy who had been unjustly hanged, and had been dead for five weeks. The boy's father was notified of the miracle while he sat at supper. The father pronounced the story nonsense, and said his son was no more alive than the roasted fowl on the table; the cooked bird promptly sat up, sprouted feathers, and flew away.  Over the centuries millions of pilgrims have walked The Way of St. James to Compostela, Spain, where his relics are, hoping to be touched in a powerful way and they have not being disappointed.

                                           

In today’s Gospel James’ mother asked Jesus if her two boys can sit next to the God in heaven.  Jesus has an interesting answer.  He asked the brothers if they could drink of the cup He was to drink of.  He wanted to know if they were willing to suffer.  They answered yes.  Jesus then told them that they would suffer, but He did not know if they would be next to God in heaven, as that is only for God to determine.   This answer leaves us with the centuries old paradox:  Suffering is often a part of the journey to union with God, (He did not spare His own Son.) but suffering cannot earn one a place in heaven. That is a pure gift from God.

 

July 24, 2006 – Monday the 16th Week in Ordinary Time

 

The Jews wanted signs, but Jesus said no sign will be given but the sign of Jonah.  Just as Jonah became a sign to the people of Nineveh, so Jesus is a sign for us.  Our faith is not based on signs and miracles, but on Jesus Himself.  If miracles were the basis, and not Christ, our minds would be convinced but not our hearts, and if the signs were to fail, our only recourse would be skepticism.

 

Last night on EWTN Father Benedict Groeschel said that if you really believe, you have no desire to argue.  He said that as his faith increased he argued with the unbeliever less and less, and today he no longer argues at all.  He does not need signs or miracles.  His sign is Jesus, who is in his heart.

 

We can witness all the miracles in the world and believe strongly in our minds, but if we do not know Jesus in our hearts, then our belief is useless.  This is why it is so important to pray and to be part of the Church.  Faith in the heart comes not from the spectacular, but from deep prayer and gathering with our brothers and sisters in Christ. “Whenever two or three are gathered together, I am there."  Faith and the Holy Spirit come to us though the Church.

 

July 20, 2006 – Thursday the 15th Week in Ordinary Time.

 

Many years ago I watched Mohammed Ali on the Tonight Show, when his name was Cassius Clay and the show’s host was  Jack Paar.  Clay said that it was impossible for him to experience joy knowing that so many people in the world were suffering.  My thought at the time was what a shame his wealth and fame could not bring him happiness.

 

Years later while reflecting on this oddity, it came to me that Ali had picked up a burden that God had not given to him.  When we do that God will not help us carry it.  Yes, He wants us to care about suffering in the world, such as the 311 civilian lives taken in Lebanon and 31 in Israel the last ten days, but not to the point that it robs us of our joy. 

 

You may be thinking that is understandable, but what about the personal burdens that have been given to us by God?  Well, as you know the yoke must be place perfectly over the shoulders of both animals in order for the burden to be evenly carried by each.  The burdens God gives us are joined to Jesus by a yoke that is uneven so that Jesus carries the full load.  Sometimes we mess this up by getting ahead of God, being willful or sinning.  Then these burdens can feel very heavy.  Our solution is the sacraments, especially Confession, and prayer, especially prayer before the Blessed Sacrament.  After confession or making a Holy Hour, we feel peace even though our personal problems that were there before may still be there after. 

 

In today’s Gospel Jesus says, “For My yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”

 

July 17, 2006 – Monday the 15th Week in Ordinary Time

 

This Saturday evening a message was left on the parish voice mail.  Can you believe it?  I got an answering machine! They are out playing tennis.”  The comment which was clearly intended to be pick-up on the voice mail was judgmental and perhaps even mean.   One priest at the time of the call was in front of church greeting parishioners and the other was setting up for mass.  Recently I was sitting by the door of the rectory when a parishioner threw the morning paper up the stairs.  I did not think he saw me until I heard him says to the person near him, “I missed him.”

 

This type of treatment which indicates a real dislike for priests bothered me a great deal when I was first ordained.  All my life people liked me a lot then suddenly I was the blunt of criticism and even intense dislike.  In time you get use to it (See the homily of July 12th.) and even find it can help make you a better priest.  

 

God wants us always to see the best in others.  In the Letter of James we read, “Always speak and act as men destined for judgment under the law of freedom.  Merciless is the judgment on the man who has not shown mercy; but mercy triumphs over judgment.”  He wants us to be good to each other and especially good to His priests.  In today’s Gospel he says to his Apostles,   “Whoever receives you receives me, and whoever receives me receives the one who sent me.”       

 

July 14, 2006 – Friday the 14th Week in Ordinary Time

 

I was in Israel in 1993 when there was peace in the Holy Land.  The presence of God was very strong.  It was wonderful. 

 

Today the whole world, including the Vatican but not including the United States, strongly condemned Israel for their attack on Lebanon.  Their response is, “What are we to do, let them take our soldiers and send missiles at us and not fight back?"  

 

It would have been better if Israel had not built settlements on Arab land, or after having done so, stopped and moved out.   Now because of it we are on the brink of another war in the Middle East and maybe even WWIII.  

 

We knew that these settlements in the occupied territories would eventually make peace in the Middle East impossible.  It clearly conflicted with our foreign policy and was absolutely not in the best interest of our country.  Yet, unbelievably over the years each administration, both Democrat and Republican, has turned a blind eye and continued to send billions of dollars to Israel. 

 

July 13, 2006 – Thursday the 14th Week in Ordinary Time

 

“Whoever will not receive you or listen to your words—
go outside that house or town and shake the dust from your feet.” Mt 10:14

The disciples were no different than you or me.  When rejected they felt hurt.  Knowing this Jesus told them, just forget about it, move on - “shake the dust from your feet.”

 

Many years ago there was a young priest trying his best to do the work of the Lord.  One Sunday he was preaching on the readings and to make his point he mentioned the evils of nuclear weapons.  This was when some of us felt we needed those types of weapons to defend our country and others felt that if we built them, one day they would be used.   Well, a parishioner in the pews was in the former group.  He took offense at the priest’s comments and walked out.  The young priest was so hurt, embarrassed and devastated by this that he left the priesthood.  It would have been better if he had followed the advise of our Lord, “Shake the dust form your feet.” In other words he should have put the parishioner’s rude exit out of his mind as though it never had happened.

 

Over the years I have preached at many Masses for healings, in many different churches.  At each Mass I gave a different homily.  They were usually like the ones on this web page, taken from readings of the day and so covering a variety of topics.  About two or three times a year something about abortion was included.  And, each time I mentioned abortion at least one young woman, usually between the age of twenty and forty, got up and walked out.  I have to admit, it disturbs me when I see someone leave the church while I am preaching.  I will try to get past it by thinking something like, “Being in favor of a woman's right to choose does not put you on the high moral ground you think it does.  Human life is far more precious than that.” (See my homily of April 22, 2006.) Crazy, that it not how Jesus wants me to handle rejection.

 

We all suffer rejection from time to time.  Better than letting it hurt us or rob our peace and joy, Jesus wants us to shake the dust from our feet, move on and remain content in His love.

 

July 12, 2006 – Wednesday the 14th Week in Ordinary Time

 

A few years back we lost a tremendous priest in our diocese.  His name was Jack Isaacs.  He worked as a missionary in Peru in the 1980s when the people there were literally starving to death because a certain powerful first world country’s banks were forcing these poor people to grow cash crops.  Father Isaacs was such a holy priest.  After retuning from Peru his diet consisted mainly of peanut butter sandwiches.  I asked him why he ate like that. His response was that he felt the protein in the peanuts was good for him and he like the taste.  I think the real reason was that it was the best way he knew to personally conserve food for the millions of starving people in the world.  I also think his poor diet caused his early death.

 

Father Isaacs told me that he had become very friendly with one of the villagers, whom we might call an intellectual.  The man was not Christian but had read a lot about our faith.   One day he had a question for Jack.  “I read in your Bible that Jesus basically did three things.  He preached, he forgave sins and he healed.  My understanding is that Catholics believe their priests to be “another Christ”.  I see the preists preaching and forgiving sins, yet I do not see them healing.  Why is this so?”

 

Francis McNutt (See our homily on March 28th) in his book, The Early Church Would Not Believe It, explores this question in depth.  He explains why healing, something so central to Jesus’ own heart, something so essential to the spreading of the Gospel, has nearly been lost.

 

In John’s Gospel Jesus says to the apostles, “Whose sins you forgive, they are forgiven them.”  We can ring any rectory doorbell in the world seeking forgiveness and the priest is expected by the Church to drop whatever he is doing to hear our confession.  Today’s Gospel tells us that Jesus gave the apostles authority to cure every disease and every illness.  We can ring any rectory doorbell in the world…….  Well, let’s pray that all our bishops and priests discover as part of their vocation the gift of healing that was infused into them at their ordination.

 

 

July 7, 2006 – Friday of the 13th Week in Ordinary Time

 

I love today’s Gospel when the Pharisees note, “Jesus eats and drink with sinners”, and Jesus tells them, “I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”  Father Stephen J. Rossetti in his book, The Joy of Priesthood writes, “When priests and sisters finish our healing program a St. Luke Institution, I often ask them if they have experienced God in some way during their stay of several months.  I have found it edifying and instructive to learn that many have had a direct and powerful experience of God.  And the theme is almost always the same.  They tell me that God came to them directly and personally and revealed to them just how much he loved them the way they were.  These graces are received with joy-filled tears and are incredibly healing on every level.” 

 

Father Rossetti believes that when we are at peace with who we are, when we know and accept the person that God has made us, we are able to accept others with all their faults and weaknesses. A lack of self-acceptance breeds an anger judgementalism of others.

 

If you find yourself judging other people or groups it may be an indication that you have not yet experienced the unconditional love of Jesus.  One little suggestion, you might try to visit the Blessed Sacrament more offer.  If you live near a Catholic Church think of dropping in every time you go by for one or two minutes of prayer.  If you can do this at least once a day, you will be amazed how deeply you will be touched.  Best of all, over the years you will find yourself wanting to visit more and stay longer.  The love you will feel is beyond words.  

 

July 4, 2006 – Tuesday of the 13th Week in Ordinary Time

 

Most of you know that five years ago this September my tinnitus suddenly became quite severe.  Just turning the pages of a newspaper made the ringing louder and ear protection was necessary when bushing my teeth.  In addition I became extremely allergic to almost everything.  Nearly four years later and after eighteen weeks in a psychiatric hospital for priests and sisters and years of twice a week sessions of psychiatric therapy, I was finally almost back to normal and able to resume my work in the healing ministry.  Suddenly one night last summer it all came back,, and two months later you could find me as a patient in St. John Vianney Hospital again.  The symptoms were worse then when I was first there. 

 

Brushing my teeth now was out of the question.  My sensitivity to incense prevented me from entering the chapel to make my Holy Hour.  These were just two of a number of problems.   When slight improvement finally began, newly painted halls set things backs for weeks.   More than a few times I was full of fear, worrying that the ringing would get so loud and last so long that I would literally go crazy.  It was then that a suggestion a friend had shared helped, “When you are afraid pray, ‘Lord, turn my fear into faith.”

 

In today’s Gospel we find the disciples in a boat on with Jesus.  Suddenly a violent storm came up on the sea, so that their boat was being swamped by waves.  Jesus was asleep, so they woke Him up.  He said to them “Why are you terrified, O you of little faith?” This is not unlike what He said to the synagogue official in Sunday’s Gospel “Do not be afraid; just have faith.”  And it is like the prayer that was given to me by my friend, “Lord, turn my fear into faith.”  We are not saved by fear, but by faith.

 

July 3, 2006 – Feast of St. Thomas the Apostle

 

In today’s Gospel Jesus invites Thomas to probe His wounds.   This was either as the late Father Raymond Brown put it a “sarcastic offer” or Thomas was like the others and did not recognize Jesus at first because His resurrected body looked somewhat different than His earthly one.   I believe that our heavenly bodies too will look different.  For one thing I think we will look much younger.

 

The night before I was to fly from San Francisco to Philadelphia, to enter a treatment center for my severe tinnitus, I had difficulty sleeping.  My ears, especially the right one, had a terrible ringing sound.  All night I worried if it were prudent to fly in my condition, yet I knew that I had to do it.  Around five in the morning, while I was lying there with these things still making sleep difficult, an image of the late Pope John Paul II appeared in my mind.  He looked much younger, maybe in his middle thirties, was extremely handsome and was dressed not as the pope, but as priest in a simple black cassock.  I prayed to him briefly and then fell into a deep sleep.  When my pastor knocked on my door a half hour later to get me up, my tinnitus was still there but the terrible ringing that made me afraid to fly was gone.  Peace, not fear, was my companion on the way to the airport.   Is it possible that the image of Pope John Paul that came to my mind reflects what he looks like in heaven? 

 

The following comes from the May 15, 2006 issue of America.  Theresa Furlow had informed her brother who was an entertainer in Las Vegas that their mother had just been killed in an automobile accident.  After they finished crying, her brother told her that he did not have anyone he could call to take his place on stage that night and he would call her in the morning.  The following is what Theresa wrote concerning their conversation the next day.

 

Then my brother recounted a most extraordinary story.  He is the ‘bad guy’ in the Medieval Times show at one of the major hotels.  The audience becomes very involved in the story line of good versus evil and in the show’s jousting tournament.  My brother’s costume, make-up and attitude are meant to elicit jeers and taunts, while the audience cheers for the good guys to prevail over him and his malevolent ways.  At the end of the show, each of the knights comes forward for his bow and to be recognized for his courage and prowess.  People cheer and pretty girls bow kisses. But when my brother comes forward, he is met with hissing, and heckling.  On the night before, though, something amazing happened.

 

As he was circling the area and people were mocking and booing him, suddenly a woman stood, looked at him, smiled, applauded and threw a red rose directly into his hand.  He looked at her and saw our mother – not as she had looked at age 82 but as the lovely young woman he remembered from his childhood.  He was awestruck.  Never, not one time in the five years he had been doing this show – and not once since – had anyone ever given him a standing ovation, let alone a rose.”

 

What is the lesion here?  Don’t waste your money on needless plastic surgery.  You are going to look great in heaven!

 

June 23 - The Solemnity of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus

                                         

 

In 1987 I had the joy of leading a pilgrimage to the holy shrines of France.  We visited the Shrine of the Miraculous Medal in Paris, with the incorrupt body of St. Catherine Laboure, the home of St. Therese in Lisieux, the convent of St. Gildard in Nevers where St. Bernadette’s incorrupt body reposes, Paray le Monial where from 1673 to 1675, Jesus appeared to St. Margaret Mary, showing her "this heart which has loved men so much", and Lourdes where the Blessed Mother appeared to St. Bernadette.

Sacred Heart of Jesus
 

 

 

 


After we returned the owner of the travel agency asked what might make the trip better.  I recommended an extra night in Paray le ManIal.  There is a very sweet presence of God’s love there.  One day is not enough.  He responded by telling me that most of the other priests that made the same pilgrimage as I, have made that recommendation.  I noticed the following year an extra night in Paray was added to the itinerary.

 

Today we celebrate the feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus.  In 1675 in Paray le Manial Jesus appeared to St. Margaret Mary and asked her to promote devotion to His Sacred Heart.  “And He (Christ) showed me that it was His great desire of being loved by men and of withdrawing them from the path of ruin that made Him form the design of manifesting His Heart to men, with all the treasures of love, of mercy, of grace, of sanctification and salvation which it contains, in order that those who desire to render Him and procure Him all the honor and love possible, might themselves be abundantly enriched with those divine treasures of which His heart is the source.” – from Revelations of Our Lord to St, Margaret Mary Alacoque.

 

Father Claude de la Columbiere, Margaret’s spiritual director wrote, “ The Sacred Heart is regarded as the symbol of that boundless love which moved the Word to take flesh, to institute the Holy Eucharist, to take our sins upon Himself, and, dying on the Cross, to offer Himself as a victim and sacrifice to the eternal Father."

 

St. Margaret Mary was inspired by Christ to establish the Holy Hour and to pray lying prostrate with her face to the ground from eleven till midnight on the eve of the first Friday of each month, to share in the mortal sadness He endured when abandoned by His Apostles in His Agony.

 

June 22, 2006 – Thursday the 11th Week in Ordinary Time

 

In today’s Gospel Jesus teaches his disciples to pray the Our Father.

 

In my homily on June 2nd I shared a mystical experience that happened to me on Pentecost Sunday in 1974.  Below I share one that happened at my ordination to the priesthood in 1980. 

 

The ordination itself, as you know, takes place at the middle of Mass.  During the Liturgy of the word I was a deacon and sat with the congregation; during the Liturgy of the Eucharist I was a priest and con-celebrated with the Archbishop at the altar.  It was at the Our Father when the mystical experience happened.  Almost immediately I became aware of the words of the prayer and that it was not me saying them, but Jesus.  He was praying to the Father and I was listening to Him even though the words were coming from my mouth.   These types of experiences are difficult to describe.  This is the best that I can do.  My voice was being used by Jesus to say the words and I was keenly conscious of it happening. 

 

Yes, I pondered often the fact that this happened the first time I said the Our Father while celebrating Mass as a priest.  I come to the conclusion that it was Our Lords way of saying to me, “You are now another Christ.”  Years later I look back at this and have an even better understand.  I am Dick Bain, a very imperfect and sinful human being, but I am also Father Bain, a priest who Jesus has used to touch others, despite my weakness.

 

Maybe now you understand why I am not in favor of alternative phrasing for the Trinity.  I personally experienced Jesus calling God “Father”.  So it seems to me almost sacrilegious to even think of giving God a new name. (Read yesterday’s homily.)    

 

June 21, 2006 – Wednesday the 11th Week in Ordinary Time

 

About ten years ago our diocese began a three year training program for parish ministers.  The very first class the point was made that we should no longer call God “Our Father” since God is neither male nor female. One student objected, “How can we not call God Father when it was Jesus who told us to do so?”   The teacher’s replied, “That was just His opinion.”   The student shouted back, “Jesus is God, He has no opinion.” 

 

On Monday delegates to The 217th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (http://www.wnbc.com/family/9393768/detail.html) approved experimental liturgies with alternative phrasings for the Trinity. The vote was 282 to 212, with 7 abstentions.  Besides the traditional Trinity of Father, Son and Holy Spirit, experimental liturgies may use Mother, Child and Womb - Rock, Redeemer, Friend, - Lover, Beloved, Love - Creator, Savior, Sanctifier and King of Glory, Prince of Peace, Spirit of Love."  The panel said that one reason for the change is that language limited to the Father and Son has been used to support the idea that God is male and that men are superior to women.  

 

In today’s Gospel Jesus says five times “your Father”.  The word he used for father was Abba which means daddy.  Personally I cannot think of another word that can covey to my psyche the God of Jesus Christ better than Abba, daddy.  If we were to substitute another word Christianity on an unconscious level, it seems to me, would be no different that any other religion.

 

June 16, 2006 – Friday the Tenth Week in Ordinary Time

 

But I say to you,
whoever divorces his wife (unless the marriage is unlawful)
causes her to commit adultery,
and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.” (Mt.5:32)

 

In the sixties, seventies and eighties the conventional wisdom was that children were better off living with a single parent than living with two parents who were having severe marital difficulties.  Today we know this is not true.  No longer can a couple having difficulties say that the kids would be better off if they were separated.

 

Last night on the Larry King show the topic was about the acceptance of openly homosexual clergy in some Christian denominations.  An Episcopal priest in condemning this practice in his own Church pointed out that the Bible prohibits all homosexual activity.  A gay Catholic layman on the panel gave a biting response to the priest.  He said that the Bible also prohibits divorce, yet without divorce your Church would not exist.

 

In Mt 5:33 is Jesus prohibiting divorce and remarriage?  Is the Episcopal Church acceptance of divorce and remarriage consistent with the teaching of Jesus Christ?   Or is the Catholic Church, which does not allow remarriage without an annulment, more faithful to the truth of the Gospel?

 

June 15, 2006 – Thursday the Tenth Week in Ordinary Time

 

A lay Catholic preacher shared this story at a mission I was attending.   He had been away from the church for many years and come back after a powerful experience of the Holy Spirit.   Several years before his neighbor had molested both his son and his daughter.   The preacher was never able to bring the man to justice, but in various ways he was able to make his neighbor’s life miserable. (I don’t remember the details of how he did this, but I do remember some of it was awful.)   A few years after the preacher’s conversion the Lord told him that he needed to forgive his neighbor. This was difficult but after six months of prayer he final did it.  Then the Lord asked the preacher to go to his neighbor and ask for forgiveness for making his life difficult.  The preacher had much more trouble with this request, but again after much prayer, and thanks to the grace of God, he did it.   The preacher said that it was only after asking his neighbor for forgiveness that he himself was healed.

In today’s Gospel Jesus says that if you recall that of your brother has anything against you go first and be reconciled with you brother.  About this St. John Chrysostom, the Bishop of Antioch in the fourth century, wrote, “The Church does not exist so that we remain divided when we come to it, but rather, so that our divisions might be made extinct. That is what the assembly means. Thus, if we have come for the Eucharist, let us not do anything that is in contradiction to the Eucharist, let us not hurt our brother. You have come to give thanks for the kindnesses you have received; don’t separate yourself from your neighbor.

June 12, 2006 – Monday the Tenth Week in Ordinary Time

A teen age boy, about seventeen or eighteen, in our parish was killed in a motorcycle accident.  I could not help noticing at the wake service that the mother of the boy seemed very stoic for a woman who had just lost her child.   During the funeral Mass the next morning, I looked at her hoping to see some emotion.  But there was none. I remember thinking, "If this poor woman continues to bury her grief she will become sick someday."

 

At the cemetery the family asked to have the final committal rite at the grave rather than at the receiving chapel.   Here the mother still showed no emotion.  After completing the prayers at the casket, I went to the family and offered my condolences.  Her sense of sorrow seemed no greater than my own, and I had not even known her son.  After this the body of the boy was lowered into the grave.  As the casket was about half way down, it finally happened.  The woman suddenly screamed and then cried uncontrollably for the longest time.  Others began to cry. No one judged the mother.  We were all witnessing a healthy reaction of a mother who had just lost her child.   As I witnessed this I thought. “Thank God, she is finally grieving.  She will be alright now.”

 

One of the defenses that we have when a loved one dies is denial.  It is there because the pain of loss is too great.  The problem with denial is that it keeps us from feeling this pain. And this can result in the morning lasting for years and later to manifest itself in our own illness.  One of the most important purposes for the funeral rituals in the Catholic Church, the wake, the funeral Mass, and the burial rite, is to help the family break though their denial and so to grieve properly.  The above is an excellent example. 

 

In today’s Gospel Jesus says, “Blessed are they who mourn,
for they will be comforted.”

 

June 3, 1980 – Saturday the Seventh Week of Easter

 

In 1975 I quite smoking.  Four years later I was in my classmate Herman’s room at St. Patrick’s Seminary in Menlo Park.  It was a few months before we would be ordained deacons.   Herman was a Carmelite monk. He was more prayerful, other worldly and holier than those of us who were studying to be secular priests. So I was sort of shocked when I found him in his room smoking a cigarette.  My response was, “Hemam I did not know you smoked.”  “I don’t.” he said, “I am nervous about the evaluations that they may not let me be ordained a deacon.”  I said. “Give me one of those cigarettes, I am nervous too.”  Three days later I was buying my own cigarettes and found myself unable to quite.

 

At first I was I confident that when I was ordained a deacon I would quite smoking.  But my ordination came and went and still I was not able to quite.  This became hard for me.  I did not want to smoke.  As the year went on I would think, “Surely I will quite when I am ordained a priest.”  But that ordination came and went and still I could not quite.  This was so frustrating to me because I have been blessed with tremendous will power.

 

Finally it was clear that I could not quite on my own, I needed God’s help.  So, on Pentecost Sunday of that year I prayed to the Holy Spirit.  “Today is the birthday of the Church.  Please give me a birthday present.  Take away my desire for cigarettes.”   My prayer was answered.  Not only was the desire for smoking taken from me, but my whole system, body and memory, was transformed to a state of one who had never smoked.  For example, in the past when I quite smoking I would enjoy being around a smoker when he or she would blow smoke